Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Brando v.d. Frankenhöhe
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Brando v.d. Frankenhöhe
    COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Faust v. d. Mainauen and Dam Iska v. Erlengrund
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.855%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)70
    Ancestor Loss-8
    Ancestor Loss in %112.90 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Sonja v.h.Diepenveense50.00011
    Faust v. d. Mainauen50.00011
    Iska v. Erlengrund50.00011
    Caesar v. Groote Marne (fader til ikke anerkendt farve)50.00011
    Atempo v. d. Laerepoort25.00011
    Toscane25.00011
    Hanno v. Emsdeich25.00011
    Bara v.d. Mainauen25.00011
    Akim v. Rothsee25.00011
    Jana v. d. Riedleite25.00011
    Bonie v. Keltenquell12.50011
    Centa v. Kirschenberg12.50011
    Leda12.50011
    Greif v. Reitbach12.50011
    Achill v.d. Krakequelle12.50011
    Debby v. Emsdeich12.50011
    Elch v. Rodekopp12.50011
    Atempo v. d. Eggemerigge12.50011
    Cora v. Deutschen Orden12.50011
    Foko v. Erlengrund12.50011
    Bonie v. Birkengehege6.25011
    Alexa v. Deutchen Orden6.25011
    Fabo v. Siegbogen6.25011
    Farah v. Hilkefeld6.25011
    Zampa6.25011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land6.25011
    Aika v. Rodekopp6.25011
    Akira v. Birkengehege6.25011
    Tempo aus Wald und Feld6.25011
    Artus v. Elztal6.25011
    Rika v. Linduri6.25011
    Karlo v. Linebrok6.25011
    Cora v. d. Marienburg6.25011
    Arras v. Eschbach6.25011
    Perle v. Buchheim6.25011
    Quell v. Huntetal6.25011
    Denver v. d. Schmiede6.25011
    Mona v. Linduri6.25011
    Igor v. Perverberg6.25011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund6.24022
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.24022
    Laika v. Linduri6.24022
    Lord v. Jurawald6.24022
    Aury v. Waidbosch6.24022
    Alf v. Siegbogen3.12011
    Nimrods Enno3.12011
    Grille v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Maika v. Wiken3.12011
    Aika v. Buchwald3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Gora v. Linebrok3.12011
    Birka v. Hasenkamp3.12011
    Elch v. Jägerkreuz3.12011
    Arras v. Eikenloh3.12011
    Castro van de Zandbult3.12011
    Dolly Nelha3.12011
    Xaver v. d. Binnenelbe3.12011
    Distel v. Buchheim3.12011
    Chassis3.12011
    Henk v. Huntetal3.12011
    Tanja De Wynen3.12011
    Gitta v. Buchheim3.12011
    Perro Nelha3.12011
    Bodo v. Pfefferteich3.12011
    Bella v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Dachs v. Wietensholt3.12011
    Elfe v.d. Brüggenstadt3.12011
    Bessy v. d. Schmiede3.12011
    Gina v. Roonstein3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s