Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Britta v. Hasselbach
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Britta v. Hasselbach
    COI 5 gen: 4.883%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Utz v. Lönsstein and Dam Diwa v. Kampstüh
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.562%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)70
    Ancestor Loss-8
    Ancestor Loss in %112.90 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Askan v. d. Klosterwiese50.00011
    Utz v. Lönsstein50.00011
    Alfa v. Blanken-Diek50.00011
    Diwa v. Kampstüh50.00011
    Dina v. d. Himmerner Heide25.00011
    Beste v. Lönsstein25.00011
    Zent v. Feuersang25.00022
    Bodo v. Weserstrand25.00011
    Etzel v. Sämmenhof25.00011
    Natter v. Lönsstein25.00011
    Arras v. Eschbach25.00011
    Aron v. Averbeck25.00011
    Cleo v. d. Meesenburg25.00011
    Assi v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Gerry v. Paradies12.50011
    Axel v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Daisy v. Sämmenhof12.50011
    Gina v. Roonstein12.50011
    Ganna v. Hasenkamp12.50011
    Korda v. Feuersang12.50022
    Linda v. Fasanenhof12.50011
    Arras v. Eikenloh12.50011
    Donar v. Alten Zollhaus12.50011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg12.50011
    Certa v. d. Frankenburg12.50011
    Chef v. Clemenswerth12.50022
    Diva v. d. Uhrau12.50011
    Don v. Forst Ostenwalde12.50011
    Baron v. Rehsprung12.50022
    Katja Germania12.50022
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern12.50011
    Atempo v. d. Eggemerigge9.36033
    Dax v. Horsetal6.25011
    Elko v. Huntetal6.25011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land6.25011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Lukas v. Linduri6.25011
    Anka v. Schönrain6.25011
    Finja v. Hasenkamp6.25011
    Asta v. d. Frankenburg6.25011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Axel v. Eickebusch6.25011
    Ilse v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Alice v. Wiebusch6.25011
    Basko v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Djuka v. Wildenloh Harz6.25011
    Freya v. Roonstein6.25011
    Lucie Nelha6.25011
    Alf v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp6.25011
    Arno v. Hahnenknoop6.25011
    Cessy v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Dele v. Paradies6.25011
    Bona v. Alten Zollhaus6.25011
    Bandit v. Wildenloh-Harz6.24022
    Flott v. Feuersang6.24022
    Alex6.24022
    Cita v. Frauengrund6.24022
    Vera v. Emsland6.24022
    Dora Germania6.24022
    Dolly v. Konigsthal6.24022
    Amsel v. d. Uphovener Mark3.12011
    Edda v. Moor3.12011
    Bona v. Hohen Geroldseck3.12011
    Donar v. Turkenweg3.12011
    Schill Aus Wald Und Feld3.12011
    Wute aus Wald und Feld3.12011
    Alf Chamavia3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s