Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Imme v. Frochtmannshof
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Imme v. Frochtmannshof
    COI 5 gen: 6.543%    low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Asso v. Jeddeloher Esch and Dam Eika v. Frochtmannshof
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.367%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)55
    Ancestor Loss7
    Ancestor Loss in %88.71 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Aron v. Averbeck87.5003111
    Eika v. Frochtmannshof50.00011
    Cleo v. d. Meesenburg50.00011
    Asso v. Jeddeloher Esch50.00011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg37.500211
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern37.500211
    Quinta v. Fasanenhof25.00011
    Gerry v. Paradies25.00011
    Askan v. d. Klosterwiese25.00011
    Ganna v. Hasenkamp25.00011
    Fina v. Neuenkämpen25.00011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell18.750211
    Alice v. Wiebusch18.750211
    Anka v. Schönrain18.750211
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof18.750211
    Burga v. d. Heustätte12.50011
    Basko v. Forst Ostenwalde12.50011
    Dina v. Neuenkämpen12.50011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land12.50011
    Dele v. Paradies12.50011
    Finja v. Hasenkamp12.50011
    Juwel v. Perverberg12.50011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide12.490312
    Bodo v. d. Kummel9.370211
    Dixie v. Falkenhorst9.370211
    Zick v. Sämmenhof9.370211
    Lara v. Werlacke9.370211
    Cora v. d. Pfauheck9.370211
    Cora v. d. Hafkesdell9.370211
    Filou v. Alten Hafen9.370211
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp6.25011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide6.25011
    Annett v. Paradies6.25011
    Anka v. Raddetal6.25011
    Arco v. Backemeer6.25011
    Grille v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Jako v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Aika v. Buchwald6.25011
    Joe v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Certa v. Hülsebusch6.25011
    Bessy v. Hasenkamp6.25011
    Hasko v. Linebrok6.25011
    Alicia v. d. Heustätte6.25011
    Bruna v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Ilse v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Kora v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Anke v. Keenmoor3.12011
    Elfe v. Linebrok3.12011
    Asta v. Butendieks3.12011
    Onko v. Tecklenburg3.12011
    Lukas v. Linduri3.12011
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s