Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Onka v. Forst Ostenwalde
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Onka v. Forst Ostenwalde
    COI 5 gen: 1.953%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Asso v. Jeddeloher Esch and Dam Inga v. Forst Ostenwalde
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.562%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Asso v. Jeddeloher Esch50.00011
    Inga v. Forst Ostenwalde50.00011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz28.120211
    Askan v. d. Klosterwiese25.00011
    Fina v. Neuenkämpen25.00011
    Cid v. d. Segeberger Heide25.00011
    Aron v. Averbeck12.50011
    Dina v. Neuenkämpen12.50011
    Pom v. Minatal12.50011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide12.50011
    Dina v. d. Himmerner Heide12.50011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land12.50011
    Arras v. Eschbach12.50011
    Laura v. Poppenforst12.50011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga9.370211
    Jerome De Wynen6.25011
    Gina v. Roonstein6.25011
    Hasko v. Linebrok6.25011
    Elsa v. Burghöft6.25011
    Arras v. Eikenloh6.25011
    Anka v. Raddetal6.25011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg6.25011
    Aika v. Buchwald6.25011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide6.25011
    Don v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald6.25011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide6.25011
    Nora v. Minatal6.25011
    Linda v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern6.25011
    Lukas v. Linduri6.24022
    Cora v. Holmesborn3.12011
    Nimrod's Birko3.12011
    Kora v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Puro v. d. Faistenau3.12011
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp3.12011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Farah v. Minatal3.12011
    Fratz v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Anka v. Schönrain3.12011
    Katja v. Minatal3.12011
    Cindy v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Elko v. Huntetal3.12011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Alice v. Wiebusch3.12011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Cliff v. Linduri3.12011
    Ilse v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Yalk De Wynen3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Lucie Nelha3.12011
    Nadja De Wynen3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Elfe v. Linebrok3.12011
    Niklas De Wynen3.12011
    Iva v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Freya v. Roonstein3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s