Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Quinni v.d. Horstbüschen
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Quinni v.d. Horstbüschen
    COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Ike v. Averbeck and Dam Ninja v.d. Horstbüschen
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)60
    Ancestor Loss2
    Ancestor Loss in %96.77 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Ike v. Averbeck50.00011
    Ninja v.d. Horstbüschen50.00011
    Kim v. d. Horstbüschen25.00011
    Lucky v. Heesenhof25.00011
    Danny v. Averbeck25.00011
    Anton v. Steinbachtal25.00011
    Anka v. Rothsee12.50011
    Westfalen's Cuno12.50011
    Emmy v. d. Horstbüschen12.50011
    Cora v. Heek12.50011
    Hanno v. Emsdeich12.50011
    Cora v. Mittelrhein12.50011
    Hardy v. Paradies12.50011
    Dean v. d. Horstbüschen12.50011
    Quell v. Huntetal9.370211
    Samson v. Linduri6.25011
    Anka v. Heek6.25011
    Bea v. d.Manningaburg6.25011
    Isko v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Elch v. Rodekopp6.25011
    Cora v. Deutschen Orden6.25011
    Dele v. Paradies6.25011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck6.25011
    Moni v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Greif v. Reitbach6.25011
    Kastor v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Kira v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Debby v. Emsdeich6.25011
    Rena v. Elbufer6.25011
    Arco v. Backemeer6.24022
    Henk v. Huntetal3.12011
    Annett v. Paradies3.12011
    Maika v. Wiken3.12011
    Carlo v. Eulenhof3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Farah v. Hilkefeld3.12011
    Halla v. Linduri3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Solojäger's Laura3.12011
    Igor v. Linebrok3.12011
    Laura v. Poppenforst3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Lukas v. Linduri3.12011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde3.12011
    Igor v. Perverberg3.12011
    Maja v. Elbufer3.12011
    Aika v. Rodekopp3.12011
    Arras v. Eschbach3.12011
    Alexa v. Deutchen Orden3.12011
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Mirco v. Linduri3.12011
    Rika v. Linduri3.12011
    Asta v. Averbeck3.12011
    Bodo v. Steyerberg3.12011
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp3.12011
    Unda v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Dana v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Ira v. Tillplatz3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s