Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Henk ll v. Huntetal
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Henk ll v. Huntetal
    COI 5 gen: 2.734%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Kuno v. d. Horstbüschen and Dam Yla v. Huntetal
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.293%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)73
    Ancestor Loss-11
    Ancestor Loss in %117.74 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Kuno v. d. Horstbüschen50.00011
    Biike v. Heidmoor50.00011
    Sepp Aus Grupilinga50.00011
    Yla v. Huntetal50.00011
    Rike v. d. Drachheide25.00011
    Arras v. Eschbach25.00011
    Valeska v. Huntetal25.00011
    Emmy v. d. Horstbüschen25.00011
    Castor v. d. Hirtenburg25.00011
    Dean v. d. Horstbüschen25.00011
    Mirco v. Linduri18.750211
    Bea v. d.Manningaburg12.50011
    Mirko v. Jurawald12.50011
    Henk v. Huntetal12.50022
    Perro Nelha12.50011
    Moni v. Tillplatz12.50011
    Tina v. d. Bilsbek12.50011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck12.50011
    Anuschka v. d. Segeberger Heide12.50011
    Quell v. Huntetal12.50011
    Vicky v. d. Holzheide12.50011
    Bautz v. d. Leda9.370211
    Amsel v. Silbergrund9.370211
    Elch v. Hanauer Land9.370211
    Asra v. Eulenhof6.25011
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck6.25011
    Solojäger's Granne6.25011
    Maika v. Wiken6.25011
    Gwenda v. Jurawald6.25011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide6.25011
    Halla v. Linduri6.25011
    Ira v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald6.25011
    Chico v. Borgkamp6.25011
    Bodo v. Steyerberg6.25011
    Perle v. d. Holzheide6.25011
    Arco v. Backemeer6.25011
    Axel v. d. Lechmündung6.25011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant6.24022
    Fango v. Nörderkamp6.24022
    Xari v. Wolfsgrund3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Fenja v. Rethwischer Moor3.12011
    Farah v. Minatal3.12011
    Elvi v. Lossetal3.12011
    Hecht v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Aika v. Buchwald3.12011
    Dana v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Elsa v. Burghöft3.12011
    Fara v. Friedleinsgrund3.12011
    Bonny v. Jägerkreuz3.12011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Yalk De Wynen3.12011
    Maestro De Wynen3.12011
    Anka v. Kappelbuck3.12011
    Solojäger's Distel3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Cora v. Schäferbusch3.12011
    Becas v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Nimrod's Birko3.12011
    Ossy De Wynen3.12011
    Derry v. Erlesberg3.12011
    Anke v. Keenmoor3.12011
    Nixe v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Dux v. Falkenhorst3.12011
    Troll v. Rheinufer3.12011
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Daisy v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Puro v. d. Faistenau3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s