Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Conny v. Steinbachtal
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Conny v. Steinbachtal
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Caj v. Alt-Hümmling and Dam Anka v. Rothsee
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.562%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)62
    Ancestor Loss0
    Ancestor Loss in %100.00 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Anka v. Rothsee50.00011
    Caj v. Alt-Hümmling50.00011
    Elch v. Rodekopp25.00011
    Samson v. Linduri25.00011
    Cora v. Deutschen Orden25.00011
    Aischa v. Heek25.00011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land12.50011
    Aika v. Rodekopp12.50011
    Igor v. Perverberg12.50011
    Igor v. Linebrok12.50011
    Alexa v. Deutchen Orden12.50011
    Hesta v. Linduri12.50011
    Asta v. Averbeck12.50011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek6.25011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel6.25011
    Gitta v. Buchheim6.25011
    Archibald v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Lord v. Jurawald6.25011
    Aika v. Buchwald6.25011
    Aury v. Waidbosch6.25011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg6.25011
    Tanja De Wynen6.25011
    Grille v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Elfe v. Linebrok6.25011
    Basko v. Bucheneck6.25011
    Xaver v. d. Binnenelbe6.25011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide6.25011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern6.25011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Ondra v. Lossetal3.12011
    Jolly De Wynen3.12011
    Astor v. d. Weide3.12011
    Cliff v. Linduri3.12011
    Anka v. Schönrain3.12011
    Dax Nelha3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Asra v. Eulenhof3.12011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Distel v. Buchheim3.12011
    Britta v. Hasselbach3.12011
    Bessi v. Winterberg3.12011
    Axel v. d. Lechmündung3.12011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Fee v. d. Kiefhornsmühle3.12011
    Chico v. Borgkamp3.12011
    Esko v. Mühlenberg3.12011
    Gwenda v. Jurawald3.12011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Asco v. Holmesborn3.12011
    Cora v. Holmesborn3.12011
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Hella v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Alice v. Wiebusch3.12011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Vulkan De Wynen3.12011
    Bruna v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald3.12011
    Alf v. Wachtelrangen3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s