Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Fleur
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Fleur
    COI 5 gen: 5.322%    low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Hecht v. Wulfshagen and Dam Vallensbæks Manja
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)72
    Ancestor Loss-10
    Ancestor Loss in %116.13 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Vallensbæks Manja50.00011
    Hecht v. Wulfshagen50.00011
    Asta v. Schlichthorst50.00011
    Hanno v. Lönsstein50.00011
    Zent v. Feuersang31.250211
    Petra v. Lönsstein25.00011
    Flora v. Wulfhagen25.00011
    Flott v. Rüdenhay25.00011
    Basko v. Forst Ostenwalde25.00011
    Freia v. Paradies25.00011
    Atempo v. d. Eggemerigge18.75033
    Korda v. Feuersang15.620211
    Chef v. Clemenswerth15.620211
    Fee Germania12.50011
    Certa v. Hülsebusch12.50011
    Bodo v. Wulfhagen12.50011
    Annett v. Paradies12.50011
    Katja Germania12.50011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern12.50011
    Cäsar v. d. Falloh12.50011
    Donni v. Rüdenhay12.50011
    Cent v. Reutherspfad12.50011
    Axel v. Wettrup9.36033
    Tempo aus Wald und Feld9.36033
    Cora v. d. Marienburg9.36033
    Dele v. Alten Hafen6.25011
    Cita Germania6.25011
    Amsel v. Maistieg6.25011
    Cuno v. Horsetal6.25011
    Cora v. Heidehof6.25011
    Edda v. Torfberg6.25011
    Asta v. Dwerger Sand6.25011
    Nimrod's Birko6.25011
    Nixe v. d. Holzheide6.25011
    Alex6.25011
    Dora Germania6.25011
    Jerome De Wynen6.25011
    Cita v. Frauengrund6.25011
    Anka v. Schönrain6.25011
    Vera v. Emsland6.25011
    Bandit v. Wildenloh-Harz6.25011
    Bor Aus Pilsen6.25011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Betty Germania6.24022
    Afra v. Hasenwinkel3.12011
    Greif v. Buchenberg3.12011
    Cliff v. Linduri3.12011
    Cita v. Hallertauer Tor3.12011
    Cindy v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Dandy v. Roonstein3.12011
    Hannibal v. d. Gräfenburg3.12011
    Nadja De Wynen3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel3.12011
    Fingal v. Wolpfeld3.12011
    Hedda v. Siling3.12011
    Niklas De Wynen3.12011
    Yalk De Wynen3.12011
    Tell v. Rudenhay3.12011
    Bella v. Torfberg3.12011
    Arno v. Lüderholz3.12011
    Betty v. Emswehr3.12011
    Dixie v. Falkenhorst3.12011
    Asja v. Alten Hafen3.12011
    Flagge v. Feuersang3.12011
    Zick v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Ulli v. Rüdenhay3.12011
    Lara v. Werlacke3.12011
    Anuschka v. Wildenloh-Harz3.12011
    Axel v. Eickebusch3.12011
    Lyra v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Arno v. Forsthaus Oehrenfeld3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s