Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Aick v. Haltergrund
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Aick v. Haltergrund
    COI 5 gen: 1.953%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Ajax v. Frochtmannshof and Dam Pina v. Bonrechtern
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)60
    Ancestor Loss2
    Ancestor Loss in %96.77 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Pina v. Bonrechtern50.00011
    Ajax v. Frochtmannshof50.00011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck28.120211
    Aika v. Lewitzgrund25.00011
    Dark v. d. Himmerner Heide25.00011
    Quinta v. Fasanenhof25.00011
    Don v. Forst Ostenwalde12.50011
    Ilka v. Bonrechtern12.50011
    Preußen's Blitz12.50011
    Burga v. d. Heustätte12.50011
    Bodo v. Steyerberg12.50011
    Linda v. Fasanenhof12.50011
    Juwel v. Perverberg12.50011
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck12.50011
    Ilse v. Fasanenhof9.370211
    Arco v. Backemeer6.25011
    Elko v. Huntetal6.25011
    Jako v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Pascha v. Elbufer6.25011
    Ossy De Wynen6.25011
    Inka v. Rehhörn6.25011
    Grille v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Alicia v. d. Heustätte6.25011
    Hecht v. d. Königseiche6.25011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Bonny v. Jägerkreuz6.25011
    Franzi v. Stockey6.25011
    Troll v. Rheinufer6.25011
    Hasko v. Linebrok6.25011
    Itta De Wynen3.12011
    Esko v. Huntetal3.12011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Bero v. Örtzefluss3.12011
    Gilla v. Reinufer3.12011
    Anett v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Anke v. Keenmoor3.12011
    Rig Chamavia3.12011
    Onko v. Tecklenburg3.12011
    Hatz v. Rehörn3.12011
    Elfe v. Linebrok3.12011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Arko v. Abtswald3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Dax v. d. Aue3.12011
    Chica v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011
    Alf v. Geierling3.12011
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Laura v. Poppenforst3.12011
    Anja v. Salinenblick3.12011
    Bruna v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Maja v. Elbufer3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Asta v. Butendieks3.12011
    Gundi v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Fonzia v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s