Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Ike v. Averbeck
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Ike v. Averbeck
    COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Anton v. Steinbachtal and Dam Danny v. Averbeck
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)61
    Ancestor Loss1
    Ancestor Loss in %98.39 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Anton v. Steinbachtal50.00011
    Danny v. Averbeck50.00011
    Hardy v. Paradies25.00011
    Hanno v. Emsdeich25.00011
    Cora v. Heek25.00011
    Anka v. Rothsee25.00011
    Samson v. Linduri12.50011
    Elch v. Rodekopp12.50011
    Isko v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Anka v. Heek12.50011
    Cora v. Deutschen Orden12.50011
    Dele v. Paradies12.50011
    Greif v. Reitbach12.50011
    Debby v. Emsdeich12.50011
    Bautz v. d. Leda9.370211
    Annett v. Paradies6.25011
    Farah v. Hilkefeld6.25011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Igor v. Perverberg6.25011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land6.25011
    Alexa v. Deutchen Orden6.25011
    Aika v. Rodekopp6.25011
    Rika v. Linduri6.25011
    Igor v. Linebrok6.25011
    Unda v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Arras v. Eschbach6.25011
    Hesta v. Linduri6.25011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp6.25011
    Quell v. Huntetal6.25011
    Asta v. Averbeck6.25011
    Dele v. Alten Hafen3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Xaver v. d. Binnenelbe3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Grille v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Elfe v. Linebrok3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Biene v. Siegbogen3.12011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund3.12011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern3.12011
    Gina v. Roonstein3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Henk v. Huntetal3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Arras v. Eikenloh3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Nimrod's Birko3.12011
    Dolly Nelha3.12011
    Gitta v. Buchheim3.12011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg3.12011
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Aury v. Waidbosch3.12011
    Tanja De Wynen3.12011
    Lord v. Jurawald3.12011
    Alo v. Burgstall3.12011
    Nimrods Enno3.12011
    Graf Nelha3.12011
    Archibald v. d. Segeberger Heide3.12011
    Aika v. Buchwald3.12011
    Maika v. Wiken3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s