Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Xena v. Huntetal
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Xena v. Huntetal
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Eddy v. d. Pfauheck and Dam Valeska v. Huntetal
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)62
    Ancestor Loss0
    Ancestor Loss in %100.00 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck50.00011
    Valeska v. Huntetal50.00011
    Vicky v. d. Holzheide25.00011
    Bodo v. Steyerberg25.00011
    Perro Nelha25.00011
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck25.00011
    Henk v. Huntetal12.50011
    Troll v. Rheinufer12.50011
    Perle v. d. Holzheide12.50011
    Solojäger's Granne12.50011
    Ossy De Wynen12.50011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land12.50011
    Hecht v. d. Königseiche12.50011
    Bonny v. Jägerkreuz12.50011
    Anja v. Salinenblick6.25011
    Gundi v. d. Königseiche6.25011
    Yalk De Wynen6.25011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Rig Chamavia6.25011
    Fango v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide6.25011
    Nixe v. d. Holzheide6.25011
    Arko v. Abtswald6.25011
    Aika v. Buchwald6.25011
    Boss v. Silbersee6.25011
    Itta De Wynen6.25011
    Solojäger's Distel6.25011
    Gilla v. Reinufer6.25011
    Alf v. Geierling6.25011
    Becas v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Xandra v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Jenny v. Römersee3.12011
    Hussa v. Rheinufer3.12011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Cora v. Holmesborn3.12011
    Cäsar v. d. Hohen Geest3.12011
    Bob v. d. Schlei3.12011
    Bautz v. Mönchsbrunnen3.12011
    Edda v. Jurawald3.12011
    Rachel De Wynen3.12011
    Hesto v. Werlacke3.12011
    Bussa v. Saaletal3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Cita v. Winterberg3.12011
    Ino v. Kreyenhorst3.12011
    Okai v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Utz v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Niklas De Wynen3.12011
    Cliff v. Linduri3.12011
    Milla v. Feuersang3.12011
    Anke v. d. Igelsheide3.12011
    Cindy v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Etzel v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Bianka v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Enno v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Axel v. Fichtenhain3.12011
    Astor v. Hofried3.12011
    Ines v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Citta v. Langen Siek3.12011
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s