Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Fiona v. Rottenanger
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Fiona v. Rottenanger
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Chef v. Seulingswald and Dam Antje aus Apelstedt
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Chef v. Seulingswald50.00011
    Antje aus Apelstedt50.00011
    Gauner v. Stockey25.00011
    Castor v. d. Hirtenburg25.00011
    Xena v. Huntetal25.00011
    Ibse v. Linebrok25.00011
    Elfe v. Linebrok12.50011
    Evita v. Stockey12.50011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck12.50011
    Archibald v. d. Segeberger Heide12.50011
    Valeska v. Huntetal12.50011
    Bautz v. d. Leda12.50022
    Tina v. d. Bilsbek12.50011
    Mirco v. Linduri12.50011
    Alex v. Bannwald12.50011
    Bodo v. Steyerberg6.25011
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck6.25011
    Solojäger's Harras6.25011
    Perro Nelha6.25011
    Asra v. Eulenhof6.25011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund6.25011
    Branca v. d. Biberquelle6.25011
    Vicky v. d. Holzheide6.25011
    Chica v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Hella v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Chico v. Borgkamp6.25011
    Asco Westerode6.25011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide6.25011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.24022
    Gitta v. Lossetal6.24022
    Zick v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Cora v. Linebrok3.12011
    Elsa v. Burghöft3.12011
    Puro v. d. Faistenau3.12011
    Ossy De Wynen3.12011
    Amber De Wynen3.12011
    Groll v. Huntetal3.12011
    Afra v. d. Bohlsener Mühle3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Farah v. Minatal3.12011
    Alf v. Siegbogen3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Troll v. Rheinufer3.12011
    Hecht v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Henk v. Huntetal3.12011
    Xari v. Wolfsgrund3.12011
    Bonny v. Jägerkreuz3.12011
    Nimrod's Birko3.12011
    Elvi v. Lossetal3.12011
    Anka v. Kappelbuck3.12011
    Solojäger's Distel3.12011
    Perle v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Dina Chamavia3.12011
    Cora v. Schäferbusch3.12011
    Becas v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Maestro De Wynen3.12011
    Derry v. Erlesberg3.12011
    Solojäger's Granne3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s