Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Danny v. Averbeck
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Danny v. Averbeck
    COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Hardy v. Paradies and Dam Cora v. Heek
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.562%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)60
    Ancestor Loss2
    Ancestor Loss in %96.77 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Cora v. Heek50.00011
    Hardy v. Paradies50.00011
    Dele v. Paradies25.00011
    Anka v. Heek25.00011
    Samson v. Linduri25.00011
    Isko v. Lönsstein25.00011
    Bautz v. d. Leda15.620211
    Annett v. Paradies12.50011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Hesta v. Linduri12.50011
    Unda v. Bärenhorst12.50011
    Igor v. Linebrok12.50011
    Asta v. Averbeck12.50011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp12.50011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp9.370211
    Archibald v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Dele v. Alten Hafen6.25011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp6.25011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek6.25011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg6.25011
    Biene v. Siegbogen6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.25011
    Basko v. Bucheneck6.25011
    Nimrod's Birko6.25011
    Graf Nelha6.25011
    Elfe v. Linebrok6.25011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel6.25011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern6.25011
    Gitta v. Lossetal6.25011
    Alo v. Burgstall6.25011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Benno v. d. Haalquelle3.12011
    Cliff v. Linduri3.12011
    Solojäger's Granne3.12011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Fee v. d. Kiefhornsmühle3.12011
    Solojäger's Anka3.12011
    Asra v. Eulenhof3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011
    Josi v. Königsfeld3.12011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Alf v. Wachtelrangen3.12011
    Chico v. Borgkamp3.12011
    Dandy v. Roonstein3.12011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Astor v. d. Weide3.12011
    Gero v. Wiken3.12011
    Hasso v. Langen Siek3.12011
    Hella v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Alice v. Wiebusch3.12011
    Britta v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Lyra v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Asja v. Alten Hafen3.12011
    Britta v. Hasselbach3.12011
    Anka v. Schönrain3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s