Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Centa v. Ohetal
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Centa v. Ohetal
    COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Greif v. Zellergarten and Dam Birke v. Stammberg
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Birke v. Stammberg50.00011
    Pia v. Kampstüh50.00011
    Artus v. Elztal50.00011
    Greif v. Zellergarten50.00011
    Mando De Wynen25.00011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde25.00011
    Laika v. Kampstüh25.00011
    Elch v. Jägerkreuz25.00011
    Bella v. Hanauer Land25.00011
    Bonni v. Lundberg25.00011
    Lukas De Wynen12.50011
    Cliff v. Linduri12.50011
    Hazel De Wynen12.50022
    Aika v. Buchwald12.50011
    Beste v. Hegholz12.50011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Hecht v. d. Königseiche12.50011
    Bautz v. d. Leda12.50011
    Joe De Wynen12.50011
    Gilla De Wynen12.50011
    Anja v. Salinenblick12.50011
    Graf v. Silbersee12.50022
    Jula Vun'N Wischhoff12.50011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz12.50011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein9.370211
    Esko v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Basko v. Bucheneck6.25011
    Gundi v. d. Königseiche6.25011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel6.25011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek6.25011
    Eika Vun'N Wischhoff6.25011
    Gitta v. Lossetal6.25011
    Boss v. Silbersee6.25011
    Cent v. Hofried6.25011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Boro v. Silbersee6.25011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land6.25011
    Xaver v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Cora v. Holmesborn6.25011
    Laura v. Poppenforst6.25011
    Hussa v. Rheinufer6.25011
    Osca v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Rachel De Wynen6.25011
    Alba v. Immenhof6.25011
    Unda v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Ino v. Kreyenhorst3.12011
    Birko v. Holsatia3.12011
    Citta v. Langen Siek3.12011
    Bob v. Zent-hof3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Xandra v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Astor v. Rothen Hahn3.12011
    Cai Holsatia3.12011
    Britta v. Hasselbach3.12011
    Biene v. Ringofen3.12011
    Asta v. Hofried3.12011
    Fanny De Wynen3.12011
    Astor v. d. Weide3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s