Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Valeska v. Huntetal
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Valeska v. Huntetal
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Perro Nelha and Dam Vicky v. d. Holzheide
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)61
    Ancestor Loss1
    Ancestor Loss in %98.39 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Vicky v. d. Holzheide50.00011
    Perro Nelha50.00011
    Henk v. Huntetal25.00011
    Perle v. d. Holzheide25.00011
    Solojäger's Granne25.00011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land25.00011
    Becas v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Yalk De Wynen12.50011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant12.50011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide12.50011
    Nixe v. d. Holzheide12.50011
    Fango v. Nörderkamp12.50011
    Aika v. Buchwald12.50011
    Solojäger's Distel12.50011
    Bautz v. Mönchsbrunnen6.25011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Cora v. Holmesborn6.25011
    Hesto v. Werlacke6.25011
    Cindy v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Rachel De Wynen6.25011
    Ines v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg6.25011
    Edda v. Jurawald6.25011
    Cita v. Winterberg6.25011
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.25011
    Cliff v. Linduri6.25011
    Niklas De Wynen6.25011
    Bob v. d. Schlei6.25011
    Enno v. Forstgarten6.25011
    Ajax v. Klockhof6.24022
    Unda v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Asta v. Werlacke3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011
    Bill v. Bessingslust3.12011
    Utz v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Esko Vun'N Wischhoff3.12011
    Bobby v. Leefeld3.12011
    Lasko v. Holmesborn3.12011
    Birko v. Holsatia3.12011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Xandra v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Anka v. d. Zirkelquelle3.12011
    Rasso v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Grandel v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Anja v. Taubertal3.12011
    Moritz v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Catja v. Niddatal3.12011
    Dina v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Olli v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Groll v. Reutherspfad3.12011
    Irrwisch De Wynen3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011
    Cilly v. Waterkant3.12011
    Ute v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Cai Holsatia3.12011
    Jenny De Wynen3.12011
    Anke v. Birkenhof3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s