Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Basko v. Aartal
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Basko v. Aartal
    COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Axel v. Murner See and Dam Basca v. Mühbrooker Meer
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)61
    Ancestor Loss1
    Ancestor Loss in %98.39 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Axel v. Murner See50.00011
    Basca v. Mühbrooker Meer50.00011
    Greif v. Reitbach25.00011
    Grandl De Wynen25.00011
    Foks v. Langer-Rau25.00011
    Erle v. d. Segeberger Heide25.00011
    Arko v. d. Seewiese12.50011
    Conrad v. Birkengehege12.50011
    Arras v. Eschbach12.50011
    Dolly v. Langer-Rau12.50011
    Rika v. Linduri12.50011
    Xanthippe De Wynen12.50011
    Distel v.d. Segeberger Heide12.50011
    Dean v. d. Schmiede12.50011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald9.370211
    Orion De Wynen6.25011
    Pascal De Wynen6.25011
    Bessy v. d. Schmiede6.25011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide6.25011
    Cora v. Karwald6.25011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund6.25011
    Iska v. Werneck6.25011
    Laika v. Linduri6.25011
    Mando De Wynen6.25011
    Horrik v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Gina v. Roonstein6.25011
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.25011
    Aury v. Waidbosch6.25011
    Pom v. Minatal6.25011
    Arras v. Eikenloh6.25011
    Farah v. Minatal3.12011
    Rachel De Wynen3.12011
    Derry v. Erlesberg3.12011
    Elsa v. Burghöft3.12011
    Caro v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Gilla De Wynen3.12011
    Emo v. Falkenhorst3.12011
    Colt v. Loisachtal3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Lucie Nelha3.12011
    Joe De Wynen3.12011
    Ondra v. Lossetal3.12011
    Nimrod's Birko3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Lessy v. Werlacke3.12011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Esko v. Mühlenberg3.12011
    Jolly De Wynen3.12011
    Nora v. Minatal3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Cora v. Werneck3.12011
    Freya v. Roonstein3.12011
    Lukas v. Linduri3.12011
    Laura v. Poppenforst3.12011
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Elch v. Jägerkreuz3.12011
    Branka v. d. Bärenklause3.12011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp3.12011
    Puro v. d. Faistenau3.12011
    Cora v. Schäferbusch3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s