Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Fina v. Neuenkämpen
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Fina v. Neuenkämpen
    COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Aron v. Averbeck and Dam Dina v. Neuenkämpen
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.270%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Aron v. Averbeck50.00011
    Dina v. Neuenkämpen50.00011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern25.00011
    Hasko v. Linebrok25.00011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg25.00011
    Anka v. Raddetal25.00011
    Anka v. Schönrain12.50011
    Elfe v. Linebrok12.50011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof12.50011
    Kora v. Fasanenhof12.50011
    Lukas v. Linduri12.50011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck12.50011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell12.50011
    Alice v. Wiebusch12.50011
    Filou v. Alten Hafen6.25011
    Dixie v. Falkenhorst6.25011
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.25011
    Cora v. d. Pfauheck6.25011
    Hella v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Zick v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Lara v. Werlacke6.25011
    Bodo v. Steyerberg6.25011
    Cora v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Elko v. Huntetal6.25011
    Ilse v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck6.25011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel6.25011
    Hesta v. Linduri6.25011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide6.25011
    Bonny v. Jägerkreuz6.24022
    Graf v. Silbersee6.24022
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp6.24022
    Cent v. Hofried3.12011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Dax v. d. Aue3.12011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Troll v. Rheinufer3.12011
    Anett v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Dandy v. Roonstein3.12011
    Vroni v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Ossy De Wynen3.12011
    Cindy v. Tenntal3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Groll v. Huntetal3.12011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Cliff v. Linduri3.12011
    Cora v. Linebrok3.12011
    Alf v. Siegbogen3.12011
    Asta v. Werlacke3.12011
    Asta v. Mönchsbrunnen3.12011
    Dina Chamavia3.12011
    Hecht v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Arko v. Kammerforst3.12011
    Asja v. Alten Hafen3.12011
    Gambo v. Werlacke3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s