Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Kim v. d. Horstbüschen
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Kim v. d. Horstbüschen
    COI 5 gen: 0.293%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Dean v. d. Horstbüschen and Dam Emmy v. d. Horstbüschen
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Emmy v. d. Horstbüschen50.00011
    Dean v. d. Horstbüschen50.00011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck25.00011
    Bea v. d.Manningaburg25.00011
    Moni v. Tillplatz25.00011
    Quell v. Huntetal25.00011
    Henk v. Huntetal12.50011
    Ira v. Tillplatz12.50011
    Bodo v. Steyerberg12.50011
    Halla v. Linduri12.50011
    Mirco v. Linduri12.50011
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck12.50011
    Maika v. Wiken12.50011
    Arco v. Backemeer12.50011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp9.370211
    Fango v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Fenja v. Rethwischer Moor6.25011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Nimrod's Birko6.25011
    Hecht v. d. Königseiche6.25011
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.25011
    Anke v. Keenmoor6.25011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land6.25011
    Bonny v. Jägerkreuz6.25011
    Troll v. Rheinufer6.25011
    Ossy De Wynen6.25011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel6.25011
    Dana v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund6.25011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.24022
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg6.24022
    Alf v. Geierling3.12011
    Dina v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Anja v. Salinenblick3.12011
    Cent v. Hasselbach3.12011
    Aika v. Buchwald3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Astor v. d. Weide3.12011
    Bella v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Gilla v. Reinufer3.12011
    Gundi v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Derry v. Erlesberg3.12011
    Lord v. Hofried3.12011
    Bob v. d. Schlei3.12011
    Cora v. Schäferbusch3.12011
    Rig Chamavia3.12011
    Anka v. Birkenhaus3.12011
    Bonny v. Rethwischer Moor3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Arko v. Abtswald3.12011
    Britta v. Hasselbach3.12011
    Lyra v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Ines v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Itta De Wynen3.12011
    Enno v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Cliff v. Linduri3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s