Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Chef v. Seulingswald
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Chef v. Seulingswald
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Gauner v. Stockey and Dam Ibse v. Linebrok
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.367%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)61
    Ancestor Loss1
    Ancestor Loss in %98.39 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Gauner v. Stockey50.00011
    Ibse v. Linebrok50.00011
    Elfe v. Linebrok25.00011
    Evita v. Stockey25.00011
    Archibald v. d. Segeberger Heide25.00011
    Alex v. Bannwald25.00011
    Solojäger's Harras12.50011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide12.50011
    Branca v. d. Biberquelle12.50011
    Hella v. Nörderkamp12.50011
    Asco Westerode12.50011
    Bautz v. d. Leda12.50011
    Chica v. d. Hafkesdell12.50011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald12.50011
    Nimrod's Birko9.370211
    Gitta v. Lossetal6.25011
    Amber De Wynen6.25011
    Puro v. d. Faistenau6.25011
    Groll v. Huntetal6.25011
    Farah v. Minatal6.25011
    Dina Chamavia6.25011
    Alf v. Siegbogen6.25011
    Zick v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Elsa v. Burghöft6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.25011
    Solojäger's Distel6.25011
    Cora v. Linebrok6.25011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Becas v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Afra v. d. Bohlsener Mühle6.25011
    Alf v. Rauhen Ebrach Tal3.12011
    Lyra v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Baldur v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Carmen v. d. Nordmannstannen3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Erko v. Jahnplatz3.12011
    Vroni v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Harro v. Lossetal3.12011
    Cliff v. Linduri3.12011
    Otti v. Faistenau3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011
    Quecke v. Haberland3.12011
    Fango v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Iva v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Josi v. Königsfeld3.12011
    Alf v.d. Goldenen Aue3.12011
    Cent v. Hofried3.12011
    Edda v. Jurawald3.12011
    Exy v. Minatal3.12011
    Uta Chamavia3.12011
    Cita v. Winterberg3.12011
    Esso v. Oberleis3.12011
    Bautz v. Mönchsbrunnen3.12011
    Priska De Wynen3.12011
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s