Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Cora v. Mittelrhein
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Cora v. Mittelrhein
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Kastor v. Wasserplatz and Dam Rena v. Elbufer
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.879%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Kastor v. Wasserplatz50.00011
    Rena v. Elbufer50.00011
    Carlo v. Eulenhof25.00011
    Maja v. Elbufer25.00011
    Lukas v. Linduri25.00011
    Laura v. Poppenforst25.00011
    Hesta v. Linduri12.50011
    Clerens v. Riedhauser Wald12.50011
    Anka v. Kappelbuck12.50011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst12.50011
    Dixi v. Elbufer12.50011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide12.50011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel12.50011
    Jerome De Wynen12.50011
    Biene v. Werhholz6.25011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel6.25011
    Cindy v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Rena v. d. Binnenelbe6.25011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp6.25011
    Cäsar v. d. Zirkelquelle6.25011
    Groll Holsatia6.25011
    Drossel v. Hofried6.25011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe6.25011
    Nadja De Wynen6.25011
    Yalk De Wynen6.25011
    Lukas De Wynen6.25011
    Cindy v. Tenntal6.25011
    Niklas De Wynen6.25011
    Irrwisch De Wynen6.24022
    Jenny De Wynen6.24022
    Groll v. Reutherspfad6.24022
    Asta v. Hofried3.12011
    Ines v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Boro v. Silbersee3.12011
    Nina v. d. Binnenelbe3.12011
    Grandel v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Amsel v. Rothäuser Bruch3.12011
    Nora v. d. Bärenburg3.12011
    Hella v. d. Moorbrücke3.12011
    Xaver v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Gero v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Rachel De Wynen3.12011
    Hazel De Wynen3.12011
    Bill v. Bessingslust3.12011
    Unda v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Astor v. d. Weide3.12011
    Britta v. Hasselbach3.12011
    Gero v. Wiken3.12011
    Hesto v. Werlacke3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Boss Holsatia3.12011
    Britta v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Dina v. Steinroden3.12011
    Condor v. d. Jägerhalle3.12011
    Ajax v. Klockhof3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s