Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Igor v. Perverberg
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Igor v. Perverberg
    COI 5 gen: 3.320%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Xaver v. d. Binnenelbe and Dam Grille v. Lönsstein
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.367%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)55
    Ancestor Loss7
    Ancestor Loss in %88.71 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Xaver v. d. Binnenelbe50.00011
    Grille v. Lönsstein50.00011
    Asco v. Holmesborn25.00011
    Bruna v. Lönsstein25.00011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide25.00011
    Bessi v. Winterberg25.00011
    Ute v. Lönsstein18.750211
    Esko Vun'N Wischhoff18.750211
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe12.50011
    Cita v. Winterberg12.50011
    Catja v. Niddatal12.50011
    Cliff v. Linduri12.50011
    Groll v. Reutherspfad12.50011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst12.50011
    Biene v. Ringofen9.370211
    Bodo v. Weserstrand9.370211
    Birko v. Holsatia9.370211
    Natter v. Lönsstein9.370211
    Grandel v. d. Lindenhöhe6.25011
    Bill v. Bessingslust6.25011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp6.25011
    Heidi v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Arco v. Reutherspfad6.25011
    Cent Graf v. Amelsbüren6.25011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel6.25011
    Janka v. Holmesborn6.25011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Zent v. Feuersang6.24022
    Baron v. Rehsprung3.12011
    Assi v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Citta v. Arlsberg3.12011
    Diva v. d. Uhrau3.12011
    Drauf v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Cilli v. Preussenwald3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Cilli v. Berghof3.12011
    Certa v. d. Frankenburg3.12011
    Freifrau v. d. Overbecker Mühle3.12011
    Dina v. Steinroden3.12011
    Astor v. d. Weide3.12011
    Britta v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Gero v. Wiken3.12011
    Brack v. d. Kautenback3.12011
    Bill v. Straufhain3.12011
    Cessie v. Holundereck3.12011
    Boss Holsatia3.12011
    Donar v. Alten Zollhaus3.12011
    Grandt v. d. Uhrau3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Amsel v. Maistieg3.12011
    Birko v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Ines v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Britta v. Hasselbach3.12011
    Manto v. d. Düsterbeck3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s