Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Anka v. Rothsee
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Anka v. Rothsee
    COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Elch v. Rodekopp and Dam Cora v. Deutschen Orden
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)58
    Ancestor Loss4
    Ancestor Loss in %93.55 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Elch v. Rodekopp50.00011
    Cora v. Deutschen Orden50.00011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land25.00011
    Igor v. Perverberg25.00011
    Aika v. Rodekopp25.00011
    Alexa v. Deutchen Orden25.00011
    Aury v. Waidbosch12.50011
    Grille v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Gitta v. Buchheim12.50011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide12.50011
    Lord v. Jurawald12.50011
    Xaver v. d. Binnenelbe12.50011
    Aika v. Buchwald12.50011
    Tanja De Wynen12.50011
    Cliff v. Linduri9.370211
    Olga v. Bärenhorst9.370211
    Bessi v. Winterberg6.25011
    Esko v. Mühlenberg6.25011
    Cora v. Holmesborn6.25011
    Bruna v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Gwenda v. Jurawald6.25011
    Vulkan De Wynen6.25011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.25011
    Asco v. Holmesborn6.25011
    Dax Nelha6.25011
    Ondra v. Lossetal6.25011
    Jolly De Wynen6.25011
    Distel v. Buchheim6.25011
    Axel v. d. Lechmündung6.25011
    Catja v. Niddatal6.24022
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof6.24022
    Esko Vun'N Wischhoff3.12011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Birke Nelha3.12011
    Itta De Wynen3.12011
    Bosco v. Rotenberg3.12011
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Maestro De Wynen3.12011
    Daisy v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Ute v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Eike v. Lossetal3.12011
    Cita v. Winterberg3.12011
    Quacks v. Lossetal3.12011
    Utz v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Nadja De Wynen3.12011
    Dux v. Falkenhorst3.12011
    Fanni v. Osterfeld3.12011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Yalk De Wynen3.12011
    Fara v. Friedleinsgrund3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Antje v. Buchheim3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011
    Groll v. Reutherspfad3.12011
    Hasso v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s