Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Debby v. Emsdeich
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Debby v. Emsdeich
    COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Quell v. Huntetal and Dam Farah v. Hilkefeld
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 3.125%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Farah v. Hilkefeld50.00011
    Quell v. Huntetal50.00011
    Maika v. Wiken25.00011
    Henk v. Huntetal25.00011
    Nimrods Enno25.00011
    Dolly Nelha25.00011
    Quacks v. Lossetal12.50011
    Fenja v. Rethwischer Moor12.50011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land12.50011
    Birke Nelha12.50011
    Lyra v. d. Königseiche12.50011
    Baron v. Wietensholt12.50011
    Fango v. Nörderkamp12.50011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant12.50011
    Cliff v. Linduri9.370211
    Cera v. Borgkamp6.25011
    Dachs v. d. Holzheide6.25011
    Bonny v. Rethwischer Moor6.25011
    Ines v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Nixe v. Lossetal6.25011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg6.25011
    Enno v. Forstgarten6.25011
    Lord v. Hofried6.25011
    Bob v. d. Schlei6.25011
    Harro v. Lossetal6.25011
    Aika v. Buchwald6.25011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide6.25011
    Lukas De Wynen6.25011
    Eike v. Lossetal6.25011
    Gundi v. d. Königseiche6.25011
    Ajax v. Klockhof6.24022
    Britta v. Lossetal6.24022
    Olga v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Anke v. Birkenhof3.12011
    Birko v. Holsatia3.12011
    Eiko Vun'N Wischhoff3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel3.12011
    Rasso v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Cindy v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Cäsar v. d. Hohen Geest3.12011
    Groll Holsatia3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Alf v. Waldhaus3.12011
    Bianka v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Xaver v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Xari v. Wolfsgrund3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Hazel De Wynen3.12011
    Dina v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Cora v. Holmesborn3.12011
    Ilka v. Elbufer3.12011
    Olli v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Cilly v. Waterkant3.12011
    Afra v. Grevensberg3.12011
    Elvi v. Lossetal3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s