Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Hanno v. Emsdeich
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Hanno v. Emsdeich
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Greif v. Reitbach and Dam Debby v. Emsdeich
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)62
    Ancestor Loss0
    Ancestor Loss in %100.00 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Greif v. Reitbach50.00011
    Debby v. Emsdeich50.00011
    Arras v. Eschbach25.00011
    Farah v. Hilkefeld25.00011
    Rika v. Linduri25.00011
    Quell v. Huntetal25.00011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund12.50011
    Maika v. Wiken12.50011
    Henk v. Huntetal12.50011
    Dolly Nelha12.50011
    Bautz v. d. Leda12.50011
    Nimrods Enno12.50011
    Gina v. Roonstein12.50011
    Arras v. Eikenloh12.50011
    Gitta v. Lossetal6.25011
    Quacks v. Lossetal6.25011
    Lukas v. Linduri6.25011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Baron v. Wietensholt6.25011
    Freya v. Roonstein6.25011
    Cora v. Schäferbusch6.25011
    Fango v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Lucie Nelha6.25011
    Birke Nelha6.25011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.25011
    Fenja v. Rethwischer Moor6.25011
    Lyra v. d. Königseiche6.25011
    Derry v. Erlesberg6.25011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land6.25011
    Hella v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Alo v. Burgstall3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Bob v. d. Schlei3.12011
    Eike v. Lossetal3.12011
    Harro v. Lossetal3.12011
    Nixe v. Lossetal3.12011
    Biene v. Siegbogen3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011
    Faro v. d. Falkenweiden3.12011
    Cliff v. Linduri3.12011
    Jenny v. Huckberg3.12011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Ines v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Gustel v. d. Kiefhornsmühle3.12011
    Cera v. Borgkamp3.12011
    Aika v. Buchwald3.12011
    Lord v. Hofried3.12011
    Joe v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Lukas De Wynen3.12011
    Dachs v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Locke Frankundfrei3.12011
    Gundi v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Bonny v. Rethwischer Moor3.12011
    Dandy v. Roonstein3.12011
    Solojäger's Granne3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Enno v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s