Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Caj v. Alt-Hümmling
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Caj v. Alt-Hümmling
    COI 5 gen: 1.562%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Samson v. Linduri and Dam Aischa v. Heek
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)70
    Ancestor Loss-8
    Ancestor Loss in %112.90 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Samson v. Linduri50.00011
    Maja Aus Grupilinga50.00011
    Cent v. d. Talsperre50.00011
    Aischa v. Heek50.00011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga28.120211
    Mirka v. Linduri25.00011
    Pascha v. Elbufer25.00011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp25.000312
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek25.00011
    Igor v. Linebrok25.00011
    Dino v. Butendieks25.00011
    Hesta v. Linduri25.00011
    Asta v. Averbeck25.00011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel18.750211
    Bautz v. d. Leda18.750211
    Elch v. Hanauer Land12.50011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern12.50011
    Archibald v. d. Segeberger Heide12.50011
    Esko v. Huntetal12.50011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund12.50011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg12.50011
    Asra v. Eulenhof12.50011
    Diana v. Linduri12.50011
    Chico v. Borgkamp12.50011
    Elfe v. Linebrok12.50011
    Maja v. Elbufer12.50011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel9.370211
    Gitta v. Lossetal9.370211
    Graf v. Silbersee9.370211
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald6.25011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Astor v. d. Weide6.25011
    Anka v. Schönrain6.25011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide6.25011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg6.25011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Britta v. Hasselbach6.25011
    Anka v. Kappelbuck6.25011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide6.25011
    Xari v. Wolfsgrund6.25011
    Cora v. Schäferbusch6.25011
    Aika v. Buchwald6.25011
    Alice v. Wiebusch6.25011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen6.25011
    Elvi v. Lossetal6.25011
    Hella v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Maestro De Wynen6.25011
    Dixi v. Elbufer6.25011
    Derry v. Erlesberg6.25011
    Diwa v. Kampstüh3.12011
    Zick v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Lara v. Werlacke3.12011
    Olli v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Golo Dankwarder Ode3.12011
    Cora v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Ajax v. Klockhof3.12011
    Ingo v. Schadwalde3.12011
    Cora v. Tannenkamp3.12011
    Cora v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Filou v. Alten Hafen3.12011
    Puro v. d. Faistenau3.12011
    Cora v. Linebrok3.12011
    Farah v. Minatal3.12011
    Afra v. Seggehorn3.12011
    Elsa v. Burghöft3.12011
    Utz v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Dixie v. Falkenhorst3.12011
    Groll v. Huntetal3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s