Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Kato (Torben Gildbjerg)
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Kato (Torben Gildbjerg)
    COI 5 gen: 0.586%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Gido v. Heek and Dam Smækbjerg Chita
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)67
    Ancestor Loss-5
    Ancestor Loss in %108.06 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Smækbjerg Chita50.00011
    Gido v. Heek50.00011
    Anka v. Heek25.00011
    Cita v. Hollbäck25.00011
    Westfalen's Cuno25.00011
    Riko v. Wasserplatz25.00011
    Tedtildas Zita25.00011
    Caj v. Alt-Hümmling25.00011
    Igor v. Linebrok18.750211
    Asta v. Averbeck18.750211
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga18.740422
    Tedtildas Ärliga Älsa12.50011
    Kascha v. Wasserplatz12.50011
    Aska v. Forstkamp12.50011
    Coach v. Ziegelweiher12.50011
    Samson v. Linduri12.50011
    Thimmer12.50011
    Castor v. Bakumer Esch12.50011
    Aischa v. Heek12.50011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg12.490312
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern12.490312
    Olga v. d. Drachheide9.370211
    Hesta v. Linduri9.370211
    Elfe v. Linebrok9.370211
    Archibald v. d. Segeberger Heide9.370211
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald9.370211
    Laura v. Poppenforst6.25011
    Lukas v. Linduri6.25011
    Renzo6.25011
    Mira v. Linduri6.25011
    Aron v. Averbeck6.25011
    Artos v. d. Schirmkiefer6.25011
    Meika v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Between The Lines Dreva6.25011
    Westfalen's Birka6.25011
    Accuparia Tayo6.25011
    Nadja6.25011
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.24022
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek6.24022
    Basko v. Bucheneck6.24022
    Dina3.12011
    Ilja Z Athenas3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Alice v. Wiebusch3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    N'Contesse Van'T Marrehof3.12011
    Puro v. d. Faistenau3.12011
    Knutbäckens Yoko3.12011
    Jerome De Wynen3.12011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund3.12011
    Uri v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Farah v. Minatal3.12011
    Asterix v. Jägerkreuz3.12011
    Anka v. Schönrain3.12011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Hella v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Birka v. d. Hirtenburg3.12011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Accuparia Teodor3.12011
    Brun3.12011
    Kira v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Gauner v. Stockey3.12011
    Dixie v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Arro3.12011
    Elsa v. Burghöft3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s