Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Skovlyst Monic
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Skovlyst Monic
    COI 5 gen: 1.562%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Andos and Dam Bess
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)79
    Ancestor Loss-17
    Ancestor Loss in %127.42 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Gilla De Wynen50.00011
    Bess50.00011
    Andos50.00011
    Erlo De Wynen50.00011
    Esko v. Bärenhorst25.00011
    Pan25.00011
    Immo De Wynen25.00011
    Z Zapri25.00011
    Hazel De Wynen25.00011
    Xandra v. Lönsstein25.00022
    Futtrups Gamine25.00011
    Rachel De Wynen25.00011
    Falco-Basco Van'T Faan25.00011
    Bob v. Zent-hof18.750211
    Dar Z Orlova Cs18.750211
    Unda v. Lönsstein18.750211
    Wysiwyg A Bertha12.50011
    Cindy Van'T Faan12.50011
    Cai Holsatia12.50011
    Arco v. Backemeer12.50011
    Mary v. Lönsstein12.50022
    Fanny De Wynen12.50011
    Wysiwyg F Sønder Askjærs Leica12.50011
    Astor v. Rothen Hahn12.50011
    Sak Fan'E Swadde12.50011
    Birka12.50011
    Dolf v. Lönsstein12.50022
    Utz v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Elk v. Bärenhorst12.50011
    Rasso v. Lönsstein9.370211
    Betty v. Weberhof9.370211
    Asta v. Werlacke9.370211
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp9.370211
    Fed Od Hanusky9.370211
    Ajda Z Vacatova9.370211
    Gambo v. Werlacke9.370211
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide6.25011
    Greif v. Felsenkeller6.25011
    Mondi6.25011
    Zloty6.25011
    Assi v. Grabengrund6.25011
    Lady De Wynen6.25011
    Jette v. d. Bilsbek6.25011
    Videbæks Bob6.25011
    Dina6.25011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten6.25011
    Natter v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Adele v. Kemmberg6.25011
    Anke v. Keenmoor6.25011
    Tim v. Feuersang6.25011
    Bautz v. Mönchsbrunnen6.25011
    Hanko v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Fuda Fan'E Swadde6.25011
    Bodo v. Weserstrand6.25011
    Adja Z Holakova3.12011
    Vallensbæks Vicki3.12011
    Dina v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Bela Od Hanusky3.12011
    Mara Fan'E Swadde3.12011
    Heidi3.12011
    Asco v. Holmesborn3.12011
    Anka v. Birkenhaus3.12011
    Cliff v. Linduri3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Alf v. Kleindarkehmen3.12011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Cent v. Hasselbach3.12011
    Dux Z Prvni Paseky3.12011
    Vallensbæks Vigan3.12011
    Afra v. d. Erse3.12011
    Freda Ut Dat Uhlendörp3.12011
    Orka Z Luzanskeho Lesa3.12011
    Harras Ut Dat Uhlendörp3.12011
    Lasko v. Holmesborn3.12011
    Sent Z Grygovskych3.12011
    Kardommel v. d. Soester Bergen3.12011
    Anka v. d. Zirkelquelle3.12011
    Athos v. d. Osbroekshoeve3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s