Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Falko v. Forst Ostenwalde
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Falko v. Forst Ostenwalde
    COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Arras v. d. Segeberger Heide and Dam Hera v. Wasserplatz
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Hera v. Wasserplatz50.00011
    Arras v. d. Segeberger Heide50.00011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land25.00011
    Laura v. Poppenforst25.00011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide25.00011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald25.00011
    Elsa v. Burghöft12.50011
    Farah v. Minatal12.50011
    Aika v. Buchwald12.50011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide12.50011
    Puro v. d. Faistenau12.50011
    Jerome De Wynen12.50011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide12.50011
    Cliff v. Linduri9.370211
    Alf v.d. Goldenen Aue6.25011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Exy v. Minatal6.25011
    Cindy v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Cora v. Holmesborn6.25011
    Iva v. d. Drachheide6.25011
    Nimrod's Birko6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.25011
    Basko v. Bucheneck6.25011
    Otti v. Faistenau6.25011
    Nadja De Wynen6.25011
    Yalk De Wynen6.25011
    Esso v. Oberleis6.25011
    Niklas De Wynen6.25011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek6.25011
    Jenny De Wynen6.24022
    Irrwisch De Wynen6.24022
    Utz v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Asra v. Eulenhof3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011
    Catja v. Niddatal3.12011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011
    Groll v. Reutherspfad3.12011
    Chico v. Borgkamp3.12011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Asta v. Amesleiten3.12011
    Bodo v.d. Wilhelmsburg3.12011
    Cord v. d. Sechsämter Stadt3.12011
    Larry v. Ringofen3.12011
    Alf v. Wachtelrangen3.12011
    Rachel De Wynen3.12011
    Rita v.Kettenlüss3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Aspe v. Bondenholz3.12011
    Hesto v. Werlacke3.12011
    Dixie v. Neuenhof3.12011
    Fee v. d. Kiefhornsmühle3.12011
    Lyra v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Betty v.d. Steubach3.12011
    Unda v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Gin v. Reuth3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s