Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Zuska v. Schlemminer Forst
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Zuska v. Schlemminer Forst
    COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Xorro De Wynen and Dam Assel v. Jürgenstorf
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 3.906%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)60
    Ancestor Loss2
    Ancestor Loss in %96.77 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Assel v. Jürgenstorf50.00011
    Xorro De Wynen50.00011
    Uska v. Schlemminer Forst25.00011
    Orion De Wynen25.00011
    Pascal De Wynen25.00011
    Zick v. Sämmenhof25.00011
    Rachel De Wynen15.620211
    Cent v. Hofried12.50011
    Elch v. Jägerkreuz12.50011
    Colt v. Loisachtal12.50011
    Alf v. Wachtelrangen12.50011
    Jolly De Wynen12.50011
    Muska v. Schlemminer Forst12.50011
    Vroni v. Sämmenhof12.50011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein9.370211
    Anka v. Jagenberg6.25011
    Cai Holsatia6.25011
    Asta v. Hofried6.25011
    Eyko v. Arlsberg6.25011
    Anja v. Handlkreutz6.25011
    Yalk De Wynen6.25011
    Achill v. Jagello6.25011
    Anja v. Salinenblick6.25011
    Hella v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Fasko v. Reutherspfad6.25011
    Nadja De Wynen6.25011
    Lietze v. Schlemminer Forst6.25011
    Bautz v. Mönchsbrunnen6.25011
    Hecht v. d. Königseiche6.25011
    Xandra v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Irrwisch De Wynen3.12011
    Cäsar v. Grenztal3.12011
    Heidi v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Candra v. Waldesgryn3.12011
    Jenny De Wynen3.12011
    Hesto v. Werlacke3.12011
    Eike v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Aran Z Manskeho Lesa3.12011
    Hussa v. Rheinufer3.12011
    Etzel v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Hanko v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Zerro v. Kettenluss3.12011
    Corda Frankundfrei3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011
    Drauf v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Mary v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Lasko v. Holmesborn3.12011
    Heike v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Dolf v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Natter v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Anka v. d. Zirkelquelle3.12011
    Gundi v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Imme v. Schlemminer Forst3.12011
    Bodo v. Weserstrand3.12011
    Gero v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Jette v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Brinka De Soissons3.12011
    Okko Fortuna3.12011
    Bill v. Bessingslust3.12011
    Erle v. Fichtenkopf3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s