Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Almas v. Auebach
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Almas v. Auebach
    COI 5 gen: 2.344%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Lukas v. Linduri and Dam Danni v. Linebrok
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)57
    Ancestor Loss5
    Ancestor Loss in %91.94 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Lukas v. Linduri50.00011
    Danni v. Linebrok50.00011
    Hesta v. Linduri25.00011
    Hella v. Nörderkamp25.00011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst25.00011
    Bautz v. d. Leda25.00011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp18.750211
    Graf v. Silbersee12.50011
    Groll v. Huntetal12.50011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel12.50011
    Cora v. Linebrok12.50011
    Gitta v. Lossetal12.50011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp12.50011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant12.50011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg12.490312
    Ines v. d. Waterkant9.370211
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen9.370211
    Flocke v. d. Tränke6.25011
    Britta v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Boss v. Silbersee6.25011
    Britta v. Hasselbach6.25011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Dolly v. Lossetal6.25011
    Quecke v. Haberland6.25011
    Fango v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Boss Holsatia6.25011
    Astor v. d. Weide6.25011
    Gero v. Wiken6.25011
    Golo Dankwarder Ode3.12011
    Mona v. Haberland3.12011
    Orlo v. d. Overbecker Mühle3.12011
    Enno Holsatia3.12011
    Manto v. d. Düsterbeck3.12011
    Natter v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Dina v. Steinroden3.12011
    Citta v. Langen Siek3.12011
    Bob v. d. Schlei3.12011
    Diwa v. Kampstüh3.12011
    Enno v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Ajax v. Klockhof3.12011
    Ingo v. Schadwalde3.12011
    Afra v. Seggehorn3.12011
    Pascha v. d. Binnenelbe3.12011
    Ino v. Kreyenhorst3.12011
    Delta v. Langen Siek3.12011
    Cita v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Cora v. Tannenkamp3.12011
    Unda v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Groll v. Reutherspfad3.12011
    Cilly v. Waterkant3.12011
    Bodo v. Weserstrand3.12011
    Rasso v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Utz v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Britta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Cent Graf v. Amelsbüren3.12011
    Olli v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s