Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Mona-Lisa v. Buchheim
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Mona-Lisa v. Buchheim
    COI 5 gen: 1.270%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Bero v. Örtzefluss and Dam Antje v. Buchheim
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)56
    Ancestor Loss6
    Ancestor Loss in %90.32 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Antje v. Buchheim50.00011
    Bero v. Örtzefluss50.00011
    Osca v. Bärenhorst25.00011
    Carla v. Sämmenhof25.00011
    Aischa v. Cellerland25.00011
    Kasper Vun'N. Wischhoff25.00011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp12.50011
    Eika Vun'N Wischhoff12.50011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant12.50011
    Groll Holsatia12.50011
    Jade v. Bärenhorst12.50011
    Benno v. d. Haalquelle12.50011
    Vroni v. Sämmenhof12.50011
    Cliff v. Linduri12.50011
    Dina v. Steinroden12.490312
    Groll v. Reutherspfad9.370211
    Britta v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Ines v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Certa v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Gero v. Wiken6.25011
    Cäsar v. Bruckhof6.25011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel6.25011
    Fasko v. Reutherspfad6.25011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Hella v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Boss Holsatia6.25011
    Boss v. Silbersee6.25011
    Birko v. Holsatia6.25011
    Hilda v. d. Hasewiesen6.25011
    Biene v. Ringofen6.25011
    Unda v. Lönsstein6.24022
    Manto v. d. Düsterbeck6.24022
    Heidi v. Lönsstein6.24022
    Etzel v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Carry v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Gina Dankwarder Ode3.12011
    Pascha v. d. Binnenelbe3.12011
    Cilli v. Berghof3.12011
    Arco v. Reutherspfad3.12011
    Citta v. Langen Siek3.12011
    Moritz v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Ino v. Kreyenhorst3.12011
    Tasso v. Feuersang3.12011
    Arrak v. Hagenpolder3.12011
    Cilly v. Waterkant3.12011
    Cita v. d. Donauauen3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Zent v. Feuersang3.12011
    Okko Fortuna3.12011
    Astor v. d. Weide3.12011
    Britta v. Hasselbach3.12011
    Delta v. Langen Siek3.12011
    Enno Holsatia3.12011
    Eike v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Rasso v. Lönsstein3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s