Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Olga v. d. Drachheide
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Olga v. d. Drachheide
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Hajo Aus Grupilinga and Dam Elsa v. Burghöft
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)62
    Ancestor Loss0
    Ancestor Loss in %100.00 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Elsa v. Burghöft50.00011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga50.00011
    Iva v. d. Drachheide25.00011
    Nimrod's Birko25.00011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek25.00011
    Basko v. Bucheneck25.00011
    Lyra v. d. Königseiche12.50011
    Alf v. Wachtelrangen12.50011
    Cliff v. Linduri12.50011
    Larry v. Ringofen12.50011
    Asra v. Eulenhof12.50011
    Aspe v. Bondenholz12.50011
    Fee v. d. Kiefhornsmühle12.50011
    Chico v. Borgkamp12.50011
    Quell v. d. Binnenelbe6.25011
    Daisy v. Ringofen6.25011
    Edda v. Haselbusch6.25011
    Arrak v. Hagenpolder6.25011
    Eyko v. Arlsberg6.25011
    Maestro De Wynen6.25011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel6.25011
    Xari v. Wolfsgrund6.25011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Harro v. Lossetal6.25011
    Anka v. Kappelbuck6.25011
    Gundi v. d. Königseiche6.25011
    Anka v. Jagenberg6.25011
    Elvi v. Lossetal6.25011
    Pitt v. d. Bärenburg6.25011
    Chica v. d. Drachheide6.25011
    Wido v. Schwege3.12011
    Lutz v. Huywald3.12011
    Hanko v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Bob v. Moorkamp3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Cilli v. Berghof3.12011
    Nadja v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Cäsar v. d. Hohen Geest3.12011
    Sonja v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Drossel v. Hofried3.12011
    Britta v. Hasselbach3.12011
    Fango v. Waterkant3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Cäsar v. d. Zirkelquelle3.12011
    Britta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Bessi v. Haselbusch3.12011
    Bill v. Bessingslust3.12011
    Bianka v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Astor v. d. Weide3.12011
    Enno v. d. Jade3.12011
    Kascha v. d. Bärenburg3.12011
    Erle v. Fichtenkopf3.12011
    Falko v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Drauf v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Freya v. Fährhaus3.12011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Eiko Vun'N Wischhoff3.12011
    Aslak v. Waldesgrün3.12011
    Candra v. Waldesgryn3.12011
    Nina v. d. Binnenelbe3.12011
    Asta v. Rauhen Ebrach Tal3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s