Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Maya v. Fasanenhof
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Maya v. Fasanenhof
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Elko v. Huntetal and Dam Ilse v. Fasanenhof
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 3.125%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 10.059%    medium    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Ilse v. Fasanenhof50.00011
    Casar v. Kreyenhorst50.00011
    Elko v. Huntetal50.00011
    Afra v. Schloss Neutenstein50.00011
    Dax v. d. Aue25.00011
    Sepp's Indra25.00011
    Dodo v. Kupferstein25.00011
    Anett v. Fasanenhof25.00011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp25.00011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant25.00011
    Birko v. Holsatia18.750211
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen12.50011
    Bella v. d. Aue12.50011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg12.50011
    Bob v. d. Schlei12.50011
    Ajax v. Klockhof12.50022
    Edu v. Forstgarten12.50011
    Erle v. Steinroden12.50011
    Ines v. d. Waterkant12.50011
    Gina Dankwarder Ode9.370211
    Manto v. d. Düsterbeck9.370211
    Dina v. Steinroden9.370211
    Rasso v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Olli v. d. Böckelsburg6.25011
    Anke v. Birkenhof6.25011
    Asta v. Duewelsknapp6.25011
    Dina v. Forstgarten6.25011
    Ingo v. Schadwalde6.25011
    Whisky v. Schwege6.25011
    Cilly v. Waterkant6.25011
    Tim v. Feuersang6.25011
    Cora v. Tannenkamp6.25011
    Assi v. Nörderkamp6.24022
    Bob v. d. Falloh6.24022
    Alf Chamavia3.12011
    Elko v. Turkenweg3.12011
    Eske v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Freya v. Steinroden3.12011
    Asso v. Stubben3.12011
    Minka v. Hulshof3.12011
    Lissi v.d Böckelsburg3.12011
    Longa Fortuna3.12011
    Zent v. Feuersang3.12011
    Basko v. Neuenhof3.12011
    Bona v. Hohen Geroldseck3.12011
    Birko v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Axel v. Teufelsloch3.12011
    Gitta v. d. Düsterbeck3.12011
    Juri v. Wolfsgrund3.12011
    Orlo v. d. Overbecker Mühle3.12011
    Biene v. d. Nordheide3.12011
    Quarz v. Schwege3.12011
    Morro v. Feuersang3.12011
    Tasso v. Feuersang3.12011
    Cilla v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Quinti v. Schwege3.12011
    Wido v. Schwege3.12011
    Illa v. Feuersang3.12011
    Gabi v. Lönsstein3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s