Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Elch v. Hanauer Land
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Elch v. Hanauer Land
    COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Bodo v. d. Hasenheide and Dam Aika v. Buchwald
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 3.125%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)61
    Ancestor Loss1
    Ancestor Loss in %98.39 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Aika v. Buchwald50.00011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide50.00011
    Graf v. Silbersee25.00011
    Cora v. Holmesborn25.00011
    Cliff v. Linduri25.00011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst25.00011
    Utz v. Lönsstein15.620211
    Drossel v. d. Grassel12.50011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp12.50011
    Boss v. Silbersee12.50011
    Dolly v. Lossetal12.50011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp12.50011
    Catja v. Niddatal12.50011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant12.50011
    Gero v. Wiken6.25011
    Boss Holsatia6.25011
    Astor v. d. Weide6.25011
    Cent Graf v. Amelsbüren6.25011
    Janka v. Holmesborn6.25011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen6.25011
    Britta v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg6.25011
    Ino v. Kreyenhorst6.25011
    Britta v. Hasselbach6.25011
    Natter v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Ines v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Citta v. Langen Siek6.25011
    Groll v. Reutherspfad6.25011
    Bodo v. Weserstrand6.25011
    Britta v. Lossetal6.25011
    Zent v. Feuersang3.12011
    Arco v. Reutherspfad3.12011
    Heidi v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Cora v. Tannenkamp3.12011
    Olli v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Grandt v. d. Uhrau3.12011
    Rasso v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Enno Holsatia3.12011
    Manto v. d. Düsterbeck3.12011
    Donar v. Alten Zollhaus3.12011
    Birko v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Diwa v. Kampstüh3.12011
    Arno v. Karlshof3.12011
    Golo Dankwarder Ode3.12011
    Dina v. Steinroden3.12011
    Pascha v. d. Binnenelbe3.12011
    Ajax v. Klockhof3.12011
    Diva v. d. Uhrau3.12011
    Anka v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Afra v. Seggehorn3.12011
    Cilli v. Preussenwald3.12011
    Assi v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Alf v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Fenna v. Kreyenhorst3.12011
    Cilly v. Waterkant3.12011
    Ingo v. Schadwalde3.12011
    Unda v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Freifrau v. d. Overbecker Mühle3.12011
    Delta v. Langen Siek3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s