Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Fenja v. Rethwischer Moor
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Fenja v. Rethwischer Moor
    COI 5 gen: 3.125%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Lord v. Hofried and Dam Bonny v. Rethwischer Moor
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Lord v. Hofried50.00011
    Bonny v. Rethwischer Moor50.00011
    Groll Holsatia31.250211
    Bodo v. d. Kummel25.00011
    Afra v. Grevensberg25.00011
    Ilka v. Elbufer25.00011
    Dina v. Steinroden15.620211
    Groll v. Reutherspfad15.620211
    Bautz v. Mönchsbrunnen12.50011
    Kessy v. d. Böckelsburg12.50011
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe12.50011
    Cindy v. Tenntal12.50011
    Hanko v. Sämmenhof12.50011
    Dixi v. Elbufer12.50011
    Blanka v. d. Böckelsburg6.25011
    Okko Fortuna6.25011
    Bill v. Bessingslust6.25011
    Rena v. d. Binnenelbe6.25011
    Heidi v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Nora v. d. Bärenburg6.25011
    Eike v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Tasso v. Feuersang6.25011
    Condor v. d. Jägerhalle6.25011
    Kondor v. Odisheim6.25011
    Lasko v. Holmesborn6.25011
    Grandel v. d. Lindenhöhe6.25011
    Arco v. Reutherspfad6.25011
    Gina Dankwarder Ode6.25011
    Anka v. d. Zirkelquelle6.25011
    Bill v. Straufhain3.12011
    Hella v. d. Moorbrücke3.12011
    Citta v. Arlsberg3.12011
    Dralle v. Waldesgryn3.12011
    Daisy v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Arko v. Katerberg3.12011
    Brack v. d. Kautenback3.12011
    Illa v. Feuersang3.12011
    Anka v. Türkenweg3.12011
    Amsel v. Maistieg3.12011
    Hecht v. Schlemminer Forst3.12011
    Nina v. d. Binnenelbe3.12011
    Certa v. d. Frankenburg3.12011
    Baron v. Rehsprung3.12011
    Nero Z Jiv3.12011
    Polo v. Feuersang3.12011
    Asko v. Nordpark3.12011
    Zent v. Feuersang3.12011
    Juno Fortuna3.12011
    Axel v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Konny v. d. Rosenburg3.12011
    Cilli v. Preussenwald3.12011
    Birko v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Astor v. Fichtenhain3.12011
    Ajax v. Klockhof3.12011
    Farah v. Odisheim3.12011
    Juri v. Wolfsgrund3.12011
    Cessie v. Holundereck3.12011
    Grille v. d. Bärenburg3.12011
    Drauf v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s