Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Andy (Bjørn Kjelgaard)
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Andy (Bjørn Kjelgaard)
    COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Claus v. d. Frankenhöhe and Dam Thanehøjs Agnes
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)61
    Ancestor Loss1
    Ancestor Loss in %98.39 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Claus v. d. Frankenhöhe50.00011
    Thanehøjs Agnes50.00011
    Asta v. Kumpfmühl25.00011
    Pico v. d. Horstbüschen25.00011
    Adelheid v. d. Frankenhöhe25.00011
    Faust v. d. Mainauen25.00011
    Hanno v. Emsdeich15.620211
    Bara v.d. Mainauen12.50011
    Neele v.d. Horstbüschen12.50011
    Egon v. Buchheim12.50011
    Arco v. Hautzerfeld12.50011
    Merlin v. d. Haagerleiten12.50011
    Agi v. Minatal12.50011
    Iska v. Erlengrund12.50011
    Debby v. Emsdeich6.25011
    Jana v. d. Riedleite6.25011
    Achill v.d. Krakequelle6.25011
    Westfalen's Chef6.25011
    Rivkah v. Buchheim6.25011
    Boss v. Labertal6.25011
    Centa v. Kirschenberg6.25011
    Dina v. Ziegelweiher6.25011
    Anton v. Steinbachtal6.25011
    Kim v. d. Horstbüschen6.25011
    Yra v. Minatal6.25011
    Lucky v. Heesenhof6.25011
    Karlo v. d. Haagerleiten6.25011
    Greif v. Reitbach6.25011
    Akim v. Rothsee6.25011
    Lexa v. d. Haagerleiten6.25011
    Akira v. Birkengehege3.12011
    Westfalen's Cuno3.12011
    Sinus Frankundfrei3.12011
    Uhl v. Poppenforst3.12011
    Rika v. Linduri3.12011
    Aikfried v. Murner See3.12011
    Anka v. Rothsee3.12011
    Foko v. Erlengrund3.12011
    Ines v. d. Haagerleiten3.12011
    Asmus v. d. Segeberger Heide3.12011
    Elch v. Rodekopp3.12011
    Bonie v. Keltenquell3.12011
    Clara v. d. Wendlinger Seerose3.12011
    Artus v. Elztal3.12011
    Quell v. Huntetal3.12011
    Emmy v. d. Horstbüschen3.12011
    Cora v. Deutschen Orden3.12011
    Denver v. d. Schmiede3.12011
    Hanko v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Cora v. Mittelrhein3.12011
    Drago v. Rodekopp3.12011
    Kira v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Arras v. Eschbach3.12011
    Perle v. Buchheim3.12011
    Farah v. Hilkefeld3.12011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Tina v. Minatal3.12011
    Dean v. d. Horstbüschen3.12011
    Lilli v. Buchheim3.12011
    Westfalen's Birka3.12011
    Centa v. Ohetal3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s