Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - DKCH Sjørslev´s P. Fie
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - DKCH Sjørslev´s P. Fie
    COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Pico v. d. Horstbüschen and Dam Sjørslev´s Isa
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.367%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)63
    Ancestor Loss-1
    Ancestor Loss in %101.61 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Sjørslev´s Isa50.00011
    Pico v. d. Horstbüschen50.00011
    Sjørslev´s China25.00011
    Mizzi v. Heek25.00011
    Gero v. Veybach25.00011
    Neele v.d. Horstbüschen25.00011
    Arco v. Hautzerfeld25.00011
    Chef v. Seulingswald25.00011
    Boss v. Mellin25.00022
    Kim v. d. Horstbüschen12.50011
    Anka v. Heek12.50011
    Izzy v. Buchheim12.50011
    Ondra v. Stockey12.50022
    Lucky v. Heesenhof12.50011
    Ibse v. Linebrok12.50011
    Bine12.50011
    Soudo-Kay's Albert12.50011
    Gauner v. Stockey12.50011
    Westfalen's Chef12.50022
    Archibald v. d. Segeberger Heide9.370211
    Elfe v. Linebrok9.370211
    Anna Fan'E Swadde6.25011
    Emmy v. d. Horstbüschen6.25011
    Alex v. Bannwald6.25011
    Majk Od Hanusky6.25011
    Z Zapri6.25011
    Igor v. Linebrok6.25011
    Greif v. Reitbach6.25011
    Leonie v. Alten Hafen6.25011
    Pan6.25011
    Evita v. Stockey6.25011
    Dean v. d. Horstbüschen6.25011
    Asta v. Averbeck6.25011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga6.24022
    Arko v. Fliethbachtal6.24022
    Kira v. Tillplatz6.24022
    Gusti v. Stockey6.24022
    Bea v. d.Manningaburg3.12011
    Branca v. d. Biberquelle3.12011
    Sak Fan'E Swadde3.12011
    Basko v. Tannengarten3.12011
    Elk v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Lord Z Dubricske Skaly3.12011
    Rika v. Linduri3.12011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg3.12011
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Hella v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Moni v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Wysiwyg A Bertha3.12011
    Dar Z Orlova Cs3.12011
    Asco Westerode3.12011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Quell v. Huntetal3.12011
    Chica v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Wysiwyg F Sønder Askjærs Leica3.12011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald3.12011
    Anja v. Veybach3.12011
    Fuda Fan'E Swadde3.12011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Arras v. Eschbach3.12011
    Solojäger's Harras3.12011
    Kata Od Hanusky3.12011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s