Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Falko v. Bökenberg
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Falko v. Bökenberg
    COI 5 gen: 1.562%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Oska v. Forst Ostenwalde and Dam Vreni v. Bonrechtern
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.953%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)73
    Ancestor Loss-11
    Ancestor Loss in %117.74 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Vreni v. Bonrechtern50.00011
    Oska v. Forst Ostenwalde50.00011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck28.120211
    Dixi v. Haltergrund25.00011
    Asso v. Jeddeloher Esch25.00011
    Asko v. d. Berkelaue25.00011
    Jule v. Linduri25.00011
    Inga v. Forst Ostenwalde25.00011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz15.620211
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck12.50011
    Kuno v. d. Horstbüschen12.50011
    Cid v. d. Segeberger Heide12.50011
    Hesta v. Linduri12.50011
    Isabell v. Buchheim12.50011
    Pina v. Bonrechtern12.50011
    Bodo v. Steyerberg12.50011
    Vasko v. d. Hafkesdell12.50011
    Groll v. Huntetal12.50011
    Boss v. Silbersee9.370211
    Troll v. Rheinufer6.25011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Emmy v. d. Horstbüschen6.25011
    Hecht v. d. Königseiche6.25011
    Bonny v. Jägerkreuz6.25011
    Falko v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Greif v. Reitbach6.25011
    Fango v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Dark v. d. Himmerner Heide6.25011
    Leonie v. Alten Hafen6.25011
    Aika v. Lewitzgrund6.25011
    Dean v. d. Horstbüschen6.25011
    Dolly v. Lossetal6.25011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Ossy De Wynen6.25011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land6.25011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel6.25011
    Laura v. Poppenforst6.25011
    Suko v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg6.24022
    Arko v. Abtswald3.12011
    Gera v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Arras v. Eschbach3.12011
    Ines v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Jerome De Wynen3.12011
    Rika v. Linduri3.12011
    Westfalen's Artus3.12011
    Arras v. d. Segeberger Heide3.12011
    Ino v. Kreyenhorst3.12011
    Alf v. Geierling3.12011
    Britta v. Hasselbach3.12011
    Preußen's Blitz3.12011
    Citta v. Langen Siek3.12011
    Groll v. Reutherspfad3.12011
    Itta De Wynen3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Anja v. Salinenblick3.12011
    Aika v. Buchwald3.12011
    Moni v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Anja v. Veybach3.12011
    Ilka v. Bonrechtern3.12011
    Gilla v. Reinufer3.12011
    Britta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Quell v. Huntetal3.12011
    Bob v. d. Schlei3.12011
    Astor v. d. Weide3.12011
    Linda v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Basko v. Tannengarten3.12011
    Rig Chamavia3.12011
    Gundi v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Enno v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Don v. Forst Ostenwalde3.12011
    Bea v. d.Manningaburg3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s