Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Ben v. Fusselkotten
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Ben v. Fusselkotten
    COI 5 gen: 2.344%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Westfalen's Don and Dam Quinti v. Heek
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 4.150%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)75
    Ancestor Loss-13
    Ancestor Loss in %120.97 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Quinti v. Heek50.00011
    Atze v. Rottenanger50.00011
    Yvonne De Wynen50.00011
    Westfalen's Don50.00011
    Ivo v. Reitbach25.00011
    Ilka v. Heek25.00011
    Anton v. Steinbachtal25.00011
    Kapp De Wynen25.00011
    Lena v. Heesenhof25.00011
    Otty De Wynen25.00011
    Rachel De Wynen15.620211
    Gora v. Reitbach12.50011
    Jolly De Wynen12.50011
    Hanno v. Emsdeich12.50011
    Westfalen's Chef12.50011
    Cora v. Mittelrhein12.50011
    Kira v. Tillplatz12.50022
    Caj v. Alt-Hümmling12.50011
    Artus v. d. Slawenschanze12.50011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga12.50022
    Anka v. Rothsee12.50011
    Anka v. Heek12.50011
    Colt v. Loisachtal12.50011
    Westfalen's Cuno12.50011
    Igor v. Linebrok9.370211
    Rika v. Linduri9.370211
    Arras v. Eschbach9.370211
    Asta v. Averbeck9.370211
    Anja v. Handlkreutz6.25011
    Yalk De Wynen6.25011
    Xandra v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Nadja De Wynen6.25011
    Greif v. Reitbach6.25011
    Debby v. Emsdeich6.25011
    Kastor v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Samson v. Linduri6.25011
    Rena v. Elbufer6.25011
    Cai Holsatia6.25011
    Elch v. Rodekopp6.25011
    Aischa v. Heek6.25011
    Bautz v. Mönchsbrunnen6.25011
    Cora v. Deutschen Orden6.25011
    Dana v. Tillplatz6.24022
    Arco v. Backemeer6.24022
    Solojäger's Laura6.24022
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde6.24022
    Irrwisch De Wynen3.12011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg3.12011
    Igor v. Perverberg3.12011
    Dolf v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Jenny De Wynen3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Aika v. Rodekopp3.12011
    Hesto v. Werlacke3.12011
    Alexa v. Deutchen Orden3.12011
    Mary v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Lasko v. Holmesborn3.12011
    Carlo v. Eulenhof3.12011
    Lukas v. Linduri3.12011
    Archibald v. d. Segeberger Heide3.12011
    Anka v. d. Zirkelquelle3.12011
    Quell v. Huntetal3.12011
    Brinka De Soissons3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Farah v. Hilkefeld3.12011
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Maja v. Elbufer3.12011
    Elfe v. Linebrok3.12011
    Gina v. Roonstein3.12011
    Zerro v. Kettenluss3.12011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund3.12011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern3.12011
    Arras v. Eikenloh3.12011
    Laura v. Poppenforst3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s