Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Bonnie v. Runenpark
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Bonnie v. Runenpark
    COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Askan v. Iberg and Dam Quilla v. Schatzrain
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Askan v. Iberg50.00011
    Quilla v. Schatzrain50.00011
    Xenia v. Lönsstein25.00011
    Jockel v. Schlemminer Forst25.00011
    Okka v. Schatzrain25.00011
    Gero v. Alt-Hümmling25.00011
    Alex v. Murner See12.50011
    Greif v. Reitbach12.50011
    Chef v. Seulingswald12.50011
    Mona v. Schatzrain12.50011
    Caj v. Alt-Hümmling12.50011
    Galli Il v. Schlemminer Forst12.50011
    Otti v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Cita v. Hollbäck12.50011
    Bautz v. d. Leda9.36033
    Elkan v. Linebrok6.25011
    Samson v. Linduri6.25011
    Don v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Anjuscha v. Schlemminer Forst6.25011
    Coach v. Ziegelweiher6.25011
    Grandl De Wynen6.25011
    Gauner v. Stockey6.25011
    Arras v. Eschbach6.25011
    Rika v. Linduri6.25011
    Foks v. Langer-Rau6.25011
    Aischa v. Heek6.25011
    Anton v. Keltenquell6.25011
    Heidehexe v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Ibse v. Linebrok6.25011
    Aska v. Forstkamp6.25011
    Helge v. Schatzrain6.25011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.24022
    Meika v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Evita v. Stockey3.12011
    Zuska v. Schlemminer Forst3.12011
    Artus v. Elztal3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Alex v. Bannwald3.12011
    Gina v. Roonstein3.12011
    Aron v. Averbeck3.12011
    Dolly v. Langer-Rau3.12011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund3.12011
    Xanthippe De Wynen3.12011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Bonie v. Birkengehege3.12011
    Asta v. Averbeck3.12011
    Dina v. Schatzrain3.12011
    Dean v. d. Schmiede3.12011
    Archibald v. d. Segeberger Heide3.12011
    Arras v. Eikenloh3.12011
    Hella v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Arko v. d. Seewiese3.12011
    Gera v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Elfe v. Linebrok3.12011
    Solojäger's Monarch3.12011
    Igor v. Linebrok3.12011
    Westfalen's Birka3.12011
    Artos v. d. Schirmkiefer3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s