Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Taurus
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Taurus
    COI 5 gen: 7.617%    low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Andros and Dam Sally
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.074%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)65
    Ancestor Loss-3
    Ancestor Loss in %104.84 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Andros50.00011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land50.00011
    Jule v. d. Hafkesdell50.00011
    Sally50.00011
    Alf v. Kleindarkehmen37.500211
    Tika25.00011
    Eva v. d. Hafkesdell25.00011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga25.00011
    Aika v. Buchwald25.00011
    Falk v. Giesenbusch25.00011
    Centa25.00011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide25.00011
    Utz v. Lönsstein18.750211
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek12.50011
    Vallensbæks Ricki12.50011
    Cliff v. Linduri12.50011
    Vallensbæks Minka12.50022
    Olga v. Bärenhorst12.50011
    Alf v. Siegbogen12.50011
    Vallensbæks Tanja12.50011
    Graf v. Kampstüh12.50011
    Graf v. Silbersee12.50011
    Cora v. Holmesborn12.50011
    Astri v. Hafkesdell12.50011
    Sissi v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Basko v. Bucheneck12.50011
    Flott v. Rüdenhay12.490312
    Fee v. d. Kiefhornsmühle6.25011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp6.25011
    Mary v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Dolly v. Lossetal6.25011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel6.25011
    Natter v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Arko v. Abtswald6.25011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Hecht v. Wulfshagen6.25011
    Catja v. Niddatal6.25011
    Dina Chamavia6.25011
    Harro v. Lossetal6.25011
    Asra v. Eulenhof6.25011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Josi v. Königsfeld6.25011
    Bodo v. Weserstrand6.25011
    Moritz v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Alf v. Wachtelrangen6.25011
    Chico v. Borgkamp6.25011
    Wicky v. Kettenluss6.25011
    Golo Dankwarder Ode6.25011
    Boss v. Silbersee6.25011
    Petra v. Lönsstein6.24022
    Zent v. Feuersang6.24022
    Fina v. Kuhlenbruch3.12011
    Basko v. Hesselborn3.12011
    Birko v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Donar v. Alten Zollhaus3.12011
    Cent v. Reutherspfad3.12011
    Baron v. Rehsprung3.12011
    Juri v. Wolfsgrund3.12011
    Diva v. d. Uhrau3.12011
    Dino Z Hradistanske Samoty3.12011
    Hella v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Flora v. Wulfhagen3.12011
    Donni v. Rüdenhay3.12011
    Piggi v. Kettenluss3.12011
    Assi v. Lönsstein3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s