Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Jakob v. Sämmenhof
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Jakob v. Sämmenhof
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Zick v. Sämmenhof and Dam Lara v. Werlacke
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 7.812%    low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)69
    Ancestor Loss-7
    Ancestor Loss in %111.29 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Zick v. Sämmenhof50.00011
    Lara v. Werlacke50.00011
    Basko v. Aartal50.00011
    Frieda v. Ziegelweiher50.00011
    Gambo v. Werlacke25.00011
    Vasko v. d. Hafkesdell25.00011
    Caro v. Ziegelweiher25.00011
    Asta v. Steinleite25.00022
    Cent v. Hofried25.00011
    Asta v. Werlacke25.00011
    Vroni v. Sämmenhof25.00011
    Hella v. Sämmenhof12.50011
    Alf v. Schinterkogel12.50011
    Suko v. d. Hafkesdell12.50011
    Argo vom Eichental(gen Bär)12.50022
    Asta v. Hofried12.50011
    Aron v. Averbeck12.50011
    Bobby v. Leefeld12.50011
    Dolli vom Reuth12.50022
    Fasko v. Reutherspfad12.50011
    Falko v. Forst Ostenwalde12.50011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Westfalen's Birka12.50011
    Okko Fortuna9.370211
    Eike v. Sämmenhof9.370211
    Etzel v. Sämmenhof9.370211
    Kira v. Tillplatz9.370211
    Gero v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern6.25011
    Westfalen's Artus6.25011
    Bodo v. Weserstrand6.25011
    Gauner v. Stockey6.25011
    Heike v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg6.25011
    Heidi v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Gera v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Ex v. Oberleis6.25011
    Bessy v. Giessbachtal6.25011
    Natter v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Axel v. Lönsstein6.24022
    Daisy v. Sämmenhof6.24022
    Nick von Kettenluss6.24022
    Bella v. Reuth6.24022
    Gambo v. Fleestedt6.24022
    Asta v. Rehsprung6.24022
    Arco v. Backemeer3.12011
    Citto von Oberleis3.12011
    Donar v. Alten Zollhaus3.12011
    Dargo v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Bella v. d. Wilhelmsburg3.12011
    Baron v. Rehsprung3.12011
    Alex v. Bannwald3.12011
    Juno Fortuna3.12011
    Dana v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Diva v. d. Uhrau3.12011
    Anka v. Schönrain3.12011
    Ilka v. Buchenberg3.12011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Certa v. d. Frankenburg3.12011
    Hecht v. Schlemminer Forst3.12011
    Cord v. d. Sechsämter Stadt3.12011
    Cora v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Alice v. Wiebusch3.12011
    Assi v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Evita v. Stockey3.12011
    Zent v. Feuersang3.12011
    Asta v. Amesleiten3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s