Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Tajs
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Tajs
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Maestro De Wynen and Dam Akita
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.074%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)60
    Ancestor Loss2
    Ancestor Loss in %96.77 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Maestro De Wynen50.00011
    Akita50.00011
    Asta v. Rauhen Ebrach Tal25.00011
    Heido v. Wiken25.00011
    Falko v. d. Tränke25.00011
    Stasi De Wynen25.00011
    Groll Holsatia12.50011
    Franka De Wynen12.50011
    Cita v. d. Tränke12.50011
    Jenny De Wynen12.50011
    Cäsar v. d. Zirkelquelle12.50011
    Kreon De Wynen12.50011
    Cent Graf v. Amelsbüren12.50011
    Gila v. Wiken12.50011
    Dina v. Steinroden9.370211
    Ysa v. Rudenhay6.25011
    Lady De Wynen6.25011
    Hazel De Wynen6.25011
    Grandt v. d. Uhrau6.25011
    Hella v. d. Moorbrücke6.25011
    Argo v. Bergwinkel6.25011
    Gero v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Boro v. Silbersee6.25011
    Groll v. Reutherspfad6.25011
    Freifrau v. d. Overbecker Mühle6.25011
    Tim v. Feuersang6.25011
    Kuno v. Grünbachtal6.25011
    Xandra v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Delta v. Langen Siek6.25011
    Enno Holsatia6.25011
    Zent v. Feuersang6.24022
    Carla Germania3.12011
    Illa v. Feuersang3.12011
    Morro v. Feuersang3.12011
    Bandit v. Grünbachtal3.12011
    Amos3.12011
    Killer v. Feuersang3.12011
    Infant v. Feuersang3.12011
    Dolf v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Mary v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Astor v. Rothen Hahn3.12011
    Tessa v. Rüdenhay3.12011
    Fee Solms3.12011
    Citta v. Langen Siek3.12011
    Asta v. d. Moorbrücke3.12011
    Lux v. Fleestedt3.12011
    Donna v. Schäftlarn3.12011
    Whisky v. Schwege3.12011
    Eibe De Wynen3.12011
    Heidi v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Bali v. d. Uhrau3.12011
    Ilka v. Buchenberg3.12011
    Tasso v. Feuersang3.12011
    Fanny De Wynen3.12011
    Ino v. Kreyenhorst3.12011
    Etzel v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Bandit v. Wildenloh-Harz3.12011
    Arco v. Reutherspfad3.12011
    Anka v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Gina Dankwarder Ode3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s