Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Lord v. Hofried
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Lord v. Hofried
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Bodo v. d. Kummel and Dam Ilka v. Elbufer
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 2.148%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)56
    Ancestor Loss6
    Ancestor Loss in %90.32 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Bodo v. d. Kummel50.00011
    Ilka v. Elbufer50.00011
    Bautz v. Mönchsbrunnen25.00011
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe25.00011
    Cindy v. Tenntal25.00011
    Dixi v. Elbufer25.00011
    Lasko v. Holmesborn12.50011
    Anka v. d. Zirkelquelle12.50011
    Rena v. d. Binnenelbe12.50011
    Groll Holsatia12.50011
    Bill v. Bessingslust12.50011
    Nora v. d. Bärenburg12.50011
    Condor v. d. Jägerhalle12.50011
    Grandel v. d. Lindenhöhe12.50011
    Drauf v. d. Lindenhöhe9.370211
    Bill v. Straufhain6.25011
    Astor v. Fichtenhain6.25011
    Groll v. Reutherspfad6.25011
    Cessie v. Holundereck6.25011
    Dralle v. Waldesgryn6.25011
    Dina v. Steinroden6.25011
    Konny v. d. Rosenburg6.25011
    Hella v. d. Moorbrücke6.25011
    Citta v. Arlsberg6.25011
    Nina v. d. Binnenelbe6.25011
    Ajax v. Klockhof6.25011
    Grille v. d. Bärenburg6.25011
    Cilli v. Preussenwald6.25011
    Asko v. Nordpark6.25011
    Polo v. Feuersang6.25011
    Alpha v. Waldfrieden3.12011
    Ajax v. Schwarzen Born3.12011
    Illa v. Feuersang3.12011
    Alan Z Serikoveho Kraje3.12011
    Axel v. Teufelsloch3.12011
    Cora v. Waldsteinberg3.12011
    Ulla Frankundfrei3.12011
    Lux v. Fleestedt3.12011
    Astra v. Klosterberg3.12011
    Gina Dankwarder Ode3.12011
    Bob v. d. Falloh3.12011
    Falk v. Waldsteinberg3.12011
    Amsel v. Windenhof3.12011
    Aris Soprec3.12011
    Assi v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Asti v. Windenhof3.12011
    York Frankundfrei3.12011
    Assi v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Bodo v. Weserstrand3.12011
    Dingo v. Spitzberg3.12011
    Heidi v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Arko v. Fischerwinkel3.12011
    Arco v. Reutherspfad3.12011
    Dukka v. Spitzberg3.12011
    Tasso v. Feuersang3.12011
    Asta v. d. Moorbrücke3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s