Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Vigerslevs Puk
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Vigerslevs Puk
    COI 5 gen: 7.812%    low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Cuno and Dam Vigerslevs Nicoll
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 7.422%    low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)60
    Ancestor Loss2
    Ancestor Loss in %96.77 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Emma v. Fürstenwald50.00011
    Cuno50.00011
    Vigerslevs Nicoll50.00011
    Coach v. Ziegelweiher50.00011
    Vallensbæks Minka31.250321
    Groll v. Reutherspfad25.00011
    Benno v. d. Sorge25.00022
    Vallensbæks Vigan25.00011
    Brith25.00011
    Westfalen's Birka25.00011
    Alex v. Murner See25.00011
    Bessi v. Ohetal25.00011
    Vallensbæks Vick25.00011
    Petra v. Lönsstein15.620321
    Flott v. Rüdenhay15.620321
    Arco v. Reutherspfad12.50011
    Heidi v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Birke v. Stammberg12.50011
    Grandl De Wynen12.50011
    Asmus v. d. Segeberger Heide12.50011
    Foks v. Langer-Rau12.50011
    Adda v. Neuenhof12.50022
    Ass v. d. Schlei12.50022
    Uhl v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Vallensbæks Ricki12.50011
    Brack v. d. Kautenback6.25011
    Arko v. d. Seewiese6.25011
    Dolly v. Langer-Rau6.25011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide6.25011
    Amsel v. Maistieg6.25011
    Natter v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald6.25011
    Hecht v. Wulfshagen6.25011
    Baron v. Rehsprung6.25011
    Certa v. d. Frankenburg6.25011
    Mando De Wynen6.25011
    Bodo v. Weserstrand6.25011
    Xanthippe De Wynen6.25011
    Dean v. d. Schmiede6.25011
    Bonni v. Lundberg6.25011
    Zent v. Feuersang6.24022
    Immo v. d. Binnenelbe6.24022
    Anke v. Birkenhof6.24022
    Cäsar v. d. Falloh6.24022
    Donni v. Rüdenhay6.24022
    Cent v. Reutherspfad6.24022
    Ajax v. Klockhof6.24022
    Katja Germania6.24022
    Anja v. Fährhaus6.24022
    Donar v. Alten Zollhaus3.12011
    Flora v. Wulfhagen3.12011
    Axel v. Wettrup3.12011
    Dax v. Horsetal3.12011
    Assi v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Dolly v. Konigsthal3.12011
    Asta v. d. Frankenburg3.12011
    Amor d. Les Huitiers3.12011
    Ulli v. Rüdenhay3.12011
    Diva v. d. Uhrau3.12011
    Flott v. Feuersang3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s