Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Einstein v. Lehmhaus
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Einstein v. Lehmhaus
    COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Elch v. Hanauer Land and Dam Jule v. d. Hafkesdell
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)61
    Ancestor Loss1
    Ancestor Loss in %98.39 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Elch v. Hanauer Land50.00011
    Jule v. d. Hafkesdell50.00011
    Eva v. d. Hafkesdell25.00011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga25.00011
    Aika v. Buchwald25.00011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide25.00011
    Graf v. Silbersee12.50011
    Basko v. Bucheneck12.50011
    Cliff v. Linduri12.50011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst12.50011
    Alf v. Siegbogen12.50011
    Astri v. Hafkesdell12.50011
    Cora v. Holmesborn12.50011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek12.50011
    Arko v. Abtswald6.25011
    Dolly v. Lossetal6.25011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel6.25011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Dina Chamavia6.25011
    Harro v. Lossetal6.25011
    Asra v. Eulenhof6.25011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Boss v. Silbersee6.25011
    Catja v. Niddatal6.25011
    Alf v. Wachtelrangen6.25011
    Josi v. Königsfeld6.25011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp6.25011
    Utz v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Chico v. Borgkamp6.25011
    Fee v. d. Kiefhornsmühle6.25011
    Britta v. Lossetal6.24022
    Edda v. Haselbusch3.12011
    Elvi v. Lossetal3.12011
    Ino v. Kreyenhorst3.12011
    Bussa v. Saaletal3.12011
    Ines v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Astor v. d. Weide3.12011
    Bodo v. Weserstrand3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Pitt v. d. Bärenburg3.12011
    Britta v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Cent Graf v. Amelsbüren3.12011
    Anka v. Jagenberg3.12011
    Dunja v. d. Krausen Eiche3.12011
    Eiko Vun'N Wischhoff3.12011
    Anka v. Kappelbuck3.12011
    Axel v. Fichtenhain3.12011
    Erko v. Jahnplatz3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Janka v. Holmesborn3.12011
    Groll v. Reutherspfad3.12011
    Britta v. Hasselbach3.12011
    Maestro De Wynen3.12011
    Natter v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Boss Holsatia3.12011
    Uta Chamavia3.12011
    Xari v. Wolfsgrund3.12011
    Gero v. Wiken3.12011
    Citta v. Langen Siek3.12011
    Lord v. Reinufer3.12011
    Eyko v. Arlsberg3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s