Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Cyra v. Fliethbachtal
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Cyra v. Fliethbachtal
    COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Castor v. Bakumer Esch and Dam Benja v. Fliethbachtal
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.758%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)57
    Ancestor Loss5
    Ancestor Loss in %91.94 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Castor v. Bakumer Esch50.00011
    Benja v. Fliethbachtal50.00011
    Bonny v. Brückhof25.00011
    Jako v. Fasanenhof25.00011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga25.00011
    Mira v. Linduri25.00011
    Basko v. Bucheneck12.50011
    Ilse v. Fasanenhof12.50011
    Esko v. Huntetal12.50011
    Corda v. Schatzrain12.50011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund12.50011
    Onko v. Tecklenburg12.50011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek12.50011
    Graf v. Silbersee12.50022
    Bautz v. d. Leda12.50011
    Gitta v. Lossetal6.25011
    Alka v. Erlesberg6.25011
    Derry v. Erlesberg6.25011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Amsel v. Fredenhof6.25011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Anett v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Asra v. Eulenhof6.25011
    Alf v. Wachtelrangen6.25011
    Cora v. Schäferbusch6.25011
    Dax v. d. Aue6.25011
    Fee v. d. Kiefhornsmühle6.25011
    Chico v. Borgkamp6.25011
    Elch v. Jägerkreuz6.25011
    Dolly v. Lossetal6.24022
    Boss v. Silbersee6.24022
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen6.24022
    Hella v. d. Lindenhöhe6.24022
    Bob v. d. Schlei3.12011
    Eyko v. Arlsberg3.12011
    Elvi v. Lossetal3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Bella v. d. Aue3.12011
    Birko v. Holsatia3.12011
    Gustel v. d. Kiefhornsmühle3.12011
    Hecht v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Erle v. Steinroden3.12011
    Anja v. Salinenblick3.12011
    Faro v. d. Falkenweiden3.12011
    Edda v. Haselbusch3.12011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Anka v. Kappelbuck3.12011
    Janka v. Tecklenburg3.12011
    Ines v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Xari v. Wolfsgrund3.12011
    Maestro De Wynen3.12011
    Pitt v. d. Bärenburg3.12011
    Anka v. Jagenberg3.12011
    Flott Frankundfrei3.12011
    Edu v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Locke Frankundfrei3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s