Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Franzi v. Auwelt
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Franzi v. Auwelt
    COI 5 gen: 1.367%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Dago v. Siegbogen and Dam Asta Westerode
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.562%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)56
    Ancestor Loss6
    Ancestor Loss in %90.32 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Dago v. Siegbogen50.00011
    Asta Westerode50.00011
    Zick v. Sämmenhof25.00011
    Afra v. d. Bohlsener Mühle25.00011
    Josi v. Königsfeld25.00011
    Ingo v. Lossetal25.00011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein12.50022
    Lord v. Reinufer12.50011
    Eike v. Lossetal12.50011
    Baldur v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Dunja v. d. Krausen Eiche12.50011
    Carmen v. d. Nordmannstannen12.50011
    Vroni v. Sämmenhof12.50011
    Cent v. Hofried12.50011
    Cäsar v. d. Zirkelquelle12.50011
    Gero v. Sämmenhof9.370211
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe6.25011
    Cita v. Winterberg6.25011
    Anka v. d. Vereinigung6.25011
    Hella v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke6.25011
    Morro v. Feuersang6.25011
    Thanhausen's Abke6.25011
    Zita v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Hella v. d. Moorbrücke6.25011
    Asta v. Hofried6.25011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Blitz v. Weithof6.25011
    Fasko v. Reutherspfad6.25011
    Etzel v. Sämmenhof6.24022
    Bodo v. Weserstrand6.24022
    Natter v. Lönsstein6.24022
    Ute v. Lönsstein6.24022
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Kandia Fortuna3.12011
    Heidi v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Bill v. Bessingslust3.12011
    Asta v. d. Moorbrücke3.12011
    Cent Graf v. Amelsbüren3.12011
    Arko v. d. Falloh3.12011
    Eike v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Cora v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Cita v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Grandel v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Illa v. Feuersang3.12011
    Nicco v. d. Uhrau3.12011
    Arko v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Xaver v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Heike v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Lux v. Fleestedt3.12011
    Conja v. Wasserschloss3.12011
    Esko Vun'N Wischhoff3.12011
    Alf v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Ilka v. Buchenberg3.12011
    Okko Fortuna3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s