Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Alf v. Siegbogen
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Alf v. Siegbogen
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Harro v. Lossetal and Dam Josi v. Königsfeld
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 3.516%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.562%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)58
    Ancestor Loss4
    Ancestor Loss in %93.55 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Harro v. Lossetal50.00011
    Josi v. Königsfeld50.00011
    Dunja v. d. Krausen Eiche25.00011
    Britta v. Lossetal25.00011
    Eiko Vun'N Wischhoff25.00011
    Lord v. Reinufer25.00011
    Morro v. Feuersang12.50011
    Biene v. Ringofen12.50011
    Thanhausen's Abke12.50011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Birko v. Holsatia12.50011
    Anka v. d. Vereinigung12.50011
    Blitz v. Weithof12.50011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke12.50011
    Zent v. Feuersang9.370211
    Illa v. Feuersang6.25011
    Natter v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Cita v. d. Tränke6.25011
    Arko v. d. Falloh6.25011
    Arko v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Bodo v. Weserstrand6.25011
    Cilli v. Berghof6.25011
    Conja v. Wasserschloss6.25011
    Dina v. Steinroden6.25011
    Alf v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Kandia Fortuna6.25011
    Cent Graf v. Amelsbüren6.25011
    Nicco v. d. Uhrau6.25011
    Cora v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Manto v. d. Düsterbeck6.25011
    Bona v. Hohen Geroldseck6.24022
    Donar v. Turkenweg6.24022
    Altje v. d. Uptloher Mark3.12011
    Juno Fortuna3.12011
    Chef v. Clemenswerth3.12011
    Grandt v. d. Uhrau3.12011
    Tasso v. Feuersang3.12011
    Zilla v. d. Frankenburg3.12011
    Petra v. Feuersang3.12011
    Don v. Kipp3.12011
    Assi v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Edda v. Torfberg3.12011
    Hasso v. Mühlenberg3.12011
    Diva v. d. Uhrau3.12011
    Ysa v. Rudenhay3.12011
    Freiherr v. Mühlenberg3.12011
    Baron v. Rehsprung3.12011
    Gitta v. d. Düsterbeck3.12011
    Asta v. d. Sechsämter Stadt3.12011
    Sandra v. Feuersang3.12011
    Korda v. Feuersang3.12011
    Argo v. Bergwinkel3.12011
    Freifrau v. d. Overbecker Mühle3.12011
    Gina Dankwarder Ode3.12011
    Axel v. Teufelsloch3.12011
    Donar v. Alten Zollhaus3.12011
    Aero v. Ernst-August-Pold.3.12011
    Alan Z Serikoveho Kraje3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s