Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Thor
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Thor
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Ajax v. Störenhaus and Dam Chila
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)62
    Ancestor Loss0
    Ancestor Loss in %100.00 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Chila50.00011
    Ajax v. Störenhaus50.00011
    King v. Fährhaus25.00011
    Fleur25.00011
    Benno v. d. Sorge25.00011
    Olle v. Fährhaus25.00011
    Adda v. Neuenhof12.50011
    Amsel v. d. Leda12.50011
    Ass v. d. Schlei12.50011
    Vallensbæks Manja12.50011
    Adda v. Wetternwege12.50011
    Benn v. Moorkamp12.50011
    Hecht v. Wulfshagen12.50011
    Basko v. Neuenhof12.50011
    Immo v. d. Binnenelbe6.25011
    Ajax v. Klockhof6.25011
    Anja v. Fährhaus6.25011
    Flora v. Wulfhagen6.25011
    Britta v. Fährhaus6.25011
    Anka v. Duewelsknapp6.25011
    Zent v. Feuersang6.25011
    Anke v. Birkenhof6.25011
    Fango v. Waterkant6.25011
    Whisky v. Schwege6.25011
    Darex Z Plotmylku6.25011
    Afra v. Huttfleth6.25011
    Flott v. Rüdenhay6.25011
    Dina v. d. Sandhöhen6.25011
    Petra v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Immo v. d. Binnenelbe6.25011
    Assi v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Ara Z Dianina Udoli3.12011
    Iras v. Odisheim3.12011
    Dona v. d. Stuve3.12011
    Cuno v. Thülenhorst3.12011
    Nero Z Jiv3.12011
    Minka v. Hulshof3.12011
    Biene v. d. Nordheide3.12011
    Quarz v. Schwege3.12011
    Alan Z Serikoveho Kraje3.12011
    Katja Germania3.12011
    Cäsar v. d. Falloh3.12011
    Longa Fortuna3.12011
    Cäsar v. d Holzheide3.12011
    Korda v. Feuersang3.12011
    Chef v. Clemenswerth3.12011
    Quinti v. Schwege3.12011
    Flora v. Settel3.12011
    Birko v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Bob v. d. Falloh3.12011
    Fee Germania3.12011
    Gabi v. Odisheim3.12011
    Donni v. Rüdenhay3.12011
    Cent v. Reutherspfad3.12011
    Bodo v. Wulfhagen3.12011
    Asso v. Stubben3.12011
    Ir Z Jiv3.12011
    Assi v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Cäsar v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Ester v. Wendland3.12011
    Lore v. Fleestedt3.12011
    Cilly v. Waterkant3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s